Sunday, February 23, 2014

NYC OTB's brother is the Port Authority

Chris Christie v. Hazel Dukes?

Gov. Chris Christie and his political allies have done the near-impossible. Their notorious traffic jam at the George Washington Bridge, engineered by Mr. Christie’s colleagues, has succeeded in getting people to pay attention to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the sprawling and secretive agency that runs not only that bridge but three other major bridges, two tunnels, five airports and port operations in the region. And, like many of those huge structures, the authority itself desperately needs fixing.
The authority is overseen jointly by Governor Christie and Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York. It has an annual budget of $8.2 billion, and there are plans to spend another $27.6 billion in capital improvements over the next decade, making the authority the one of the most important government agencies in both states.
Over the years, the Port Authority has often served as a political candy jar, providing patronage jobs for political allies. Mr. Christie has been particularly skillful at doling out well-paid jobs at the authority to his supporters. By most counts, there are at least 50 agency employees who owe their jobs to the New Jersey governor.
The traffic scandal that has resulted in numerous investigations and two resignations of Christie appointees is just the latest example of how governance of the Port Authority is tainted by personal politics. And because two states share executive control, and thus responsibility, there is no meaningful oversight.
Major structural reforms would require legislative approval in Albany and Trenton, which would be hard but definitely worth a try. New Jersey, for instance, could help matters by enacting the equivalent of a reform law approved in New York that, among other things, required board members to pledge to uphold their fiduciary duties to their agency’s mission, not to their patron in the governor’s mansion. Short of that, the two governors should make changes that could make the authority less political and more professional.
The Port Authority’s 12-member board of commissioners is appointed by the governors, six by each. They should be appointed on the basis of their professional qualifications, not political connections, as so often happens, and held to six-year term limits. Some holdovers have been there for more than 10 years.
Each commissioner should also publicly disclose potential conflicts of interest well before the authority makes its decisions. These potential conflicts should be regularly displayed on the Port Authority’s website. Commissioners have routinely been allowed to lobby for contracts that could affect personal businesses and, only later after the decision is made, would they formally recuse themselves in the official minutes. Their recusal in each case should be announced at the public board meeting.
Under the traditional power-sharing arrangement, New Jersey appoints the chairman of the board, New York the executive director. That worked well until 1995, when Gov. George Pataki of New York chose an incompetent executive. The move so angered New Jersey’s governor at the time, Christine Todd Whitman, that she demanded the right to appoint a deputy executive director as well. That change gives New Jersey more power over day-to-day decisions. It’s time to allow the executive to pick his or her own deputy after consulting with the board.
The authority is notoriously secretive, despite some recent efforts to provide more information on its website. It is time to require more transparency, including clear public announcements of all items approved by the board while in public session. The authority should also have to answer to rigorous freedom of information laws in both states. There must be stronger protections for whistle-blowers, and the two state legislatures should not approve commissioners until they have been carefully vetted for conflicts of interest as well as professional qualifications.
Mr. Christie should want to make these changes, if only to show he’s aware of the damage his people have done. Mr. Cuomo should embrace them as an expression of his interest in sound government.
One interesting aspect of the current mess is that the authority was created more than 90 years ago not only to address the shared needs of both states but also to wring out as much local patronage and politics as possible. Mr. Christie has shown how easy it is to turn back the clock.

Greek and Turkish New Yorkers unite to

uphold NY Const. Art. 1, Sec 3 and tell Andrew Cuomo he is free to do as he wishes but that he can't close Nassau OTB based upon his religious preference.








HI-
Thanks for the help. The item’s below. I’d be happy to mail you a copy, if you give me a mailing address.

Claude Solnik
(631) 913-4244
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348 

Home > LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays

Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012


Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.

Greek and Turkish Cypriots Unite to Restore a Church and a Bond

Launch media viewer
A mosque stands near the church of St. Charalambos, in Kontea, in the Turkish-controlled north of Cyprus. The church had fallen into disrepair since the island nation was divided in 1974. Angelos Tzortzinis for The New York Times
KONTEA, Cyprus — In the days before this island was cleft between Greek and Turkish control, the church of St. Charalambos in this tiny village was a gathering place for all. But after decades of division, and fruitless talks between political leaders, local people grew tired of watching its paint peel and its altar decay. They took matters into their own hands.
Like the church, relations between the two communities had crumbled after the island was partitioned after the Turkish military invasion of 1974. But this month, Turkish artisans’ drills buzzed. Greek woodworkers carved flourishes into the altar. After two years of work, craftsmen from both communities hurriedly polished the church in time for a grand rechristening that united nearly 500 Greek and Turkish Cypriots in a celebration under its lofty vaults — the first time the church had been used in 40 years.
“After all this time, the people are ready to reconcile,” said Xenios Konteatis, 79, a retired Greek Cypriot who lived in Kontea before the Turkish invasion forced his family into a tearful flight to what is now the Greek-controlled south.
TURKEY
GREECE
CYPRUS
CRETE
Mediterranean Sea
TURKISH-
controlled
Nicosia
Kontea
GREEK-
controlled
CYPRUS
40 miles
“Of course there are still a lot of painful memories,” added Mr. Konteatis, who must drive past Turkish guards and barbed wire to reach the village, where his former home remains occupied by Turkish settlers. “But we have the will to come together.”
The extraordinary grass-roots effort to restore St. Charalambos is one of at least 40 cooperative projects that have been begun across the island to restore Greek and Turkish monuments, including mosques, that have deteriorated in divided Cyprus.
Like the one here, these projects are perhaps the most tangible sign that the long-festering recriminations in the island’s small communities have softened into a desire for healing that has far outpaced any progress by Greek and Turkish Cypriot political leaders.
Last week, President Nicos Anastasiades of Cyprus and the Turkish Cypriot leader, Dervis Eroglu, met in Nicosia, the capital, for the first time since talks were last halted in 2012. They declared that the status quo was unacceptable.
Many agree. “We cannot accept that in the 21st century, when Europe has been united after two bloody world wars, and when apartheid has been abolished in South Africa, that Cyprus is a country still divided,” said Theofilos Theofilou, a Greek Cypriot who helps run the Committee on Missing Persons with a Turkish counterpart investigating the hundreds of Greek and Turkish Cypriots who disappeared in the conflict.
But others are not holding their breath. After Turkish forces invaded following a Greek military-inspired coup, Ankara declared the northern third of the island a separate republic. It remains unrecognized by any state but Turkey, while the Greek south has joined the European Union. United Nations forces still patrol a buffer zone along the so-called Green Line, which runs through the island like a scar.
Multiple peace talks have collapsed amid disputes over power sharing, the redrawing of property boundaries and the claims of thousands of displaced people. Yet even as political efforts stumble, citizen-led peace projects like the one in Kontea are blossoming.
“Kontea represents a genuine grass-roots effort to find a common purpose,” said John M. Koenig, the American ambassador to Cyprus. “It’s an inspiring story, and more of them are happening.”
East of Kontea, Turkish Cypriots in the port city of Famagusta have joined with displaced Greeks to demand the opening of Varosha, a once-glittering beach resort that lured Elizabeth Taylor and other stars. Today, it has decayed into a veritable ghost city under barbed wire and the rifle points of Turkish troops.
Any renewal would hinge on a breakthrough in peace talks. But locals are busying themselves with plans to turn Varosha into an ecological city in the hope of spurring economic development.
View slide show|7 Photos

In Divided Cyprus, a Common Goal

In Divided Cyprus, a Common Goal

Angelos Tzortzinis for The New York Times
“Before, there were accusations on both sides — who destroyed what, who is responsible,” said Takis Hadjidemetriou, a Greek Cypriot who leads the United Nations Technical Committee on Cultural Heritage with a Turkish counterpart. “We decided to change the climate from confrontation to cooperation, for the sake of all Cypriots.”
“The Cypriot people have no hatred in our hearts,” he continued. “Each one understands the pain of the other, which is considered the pain of Cyprus.”
Such is the case in Kontea, a village that bustled with activity until the invasion drove out Greeks. In 2003, travel restrictions across the Green Line were first eased, and Charalambos S. Pericleous, a former resident, was captivated by the possibility of working with the Turks now living here to restore the village to its former glory.
“It was the first time we came into contact with Turkish Cypriots at that level,” said Mr. Pericleous, now president of the Kontea Heritage Foundation. “We feared they might respond negatively. We were surprised that their response was very positive.”
Not everyone was on board. “We had some problems, because not everybody thought like we did,” said Ali Tayip, a Turkish Cypriot who is a supervisor of the restoration. “There were people who were against peace, and against any interaction between Greeks and Turks. But the project helped form a bond, and now they are closer to each other.”
In 2010, the community planted a Peace Park, an oasis with 1,100 carob trees and a playground. Soon after, the group restored a dilapidated Frankish cloister abutting the church, less than 500 feet from a Turkish mosque towering in the sun.
Then came St. Charalambos, symbolic to all the villages in the area and the site of a large marketplace where Greeks and Turks mingled before the division. Restoring it was an idea “that started from the bottom up — we didn’t wait to be led from above,” said Mr. Pericleous, who urged villagers “to open our minds and our hearts to peace.”
As workers put the finishing touches on the church this month, Mr. Konteatis, the retired Greek Cypriot, eagerly showed before and after photos of the reconstruction, while Mr. Tayip passed around homemade wine.
A young Turkish artisan with a broad smile presented a cake with cream and ground pistachios. A Greek carpenter cut oranges picked from nearby trees, and poured vodka into tiny cups.
On Sunday, as people from all corners of Cyprus jammed into St. Charalambos, Muslim and Christian clerics recited prayers at the restored altar. Turkish Cypriots sold doughnuts in stalls outside, while older Greek Cypriots patiently waited to light candles and bow before icons.
“Look at us,” Mr. Tayip said. “It can be this peaceful, if everybody wants it. After all, we are all human beings.”
Correction: February 21, 2014
An earlier version of a picture caption with this article misidentified the building shown. It is of a mosque near the church of St. Charalambos in Kontea, not the church itself.

Andrew Cuomo cheers on the religious right

There is only one religion in New York, Andrew Cuomo. But see NY Const. Art 1, Sec. 3
Andrew Cuomo, if not God, carries out the law to enforce his religious calendar over the beliefs of ALL OTHERs. Andrew Cuomo is THE GREATEST?

HI-
Thanks for the help. The item’s below. I’d be happy to mail you a copy, if you give me a mailing address.

Claude Solnik
(631) 913-4244
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348 

Home > LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays

Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012


Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.



Religious Right in Arizona Cheers Bill Allowing Businesses to Refuse to Serve Gays

A florist would not provide flowers for the wedding last year of Robert Ingersoll, left, and Curt Freed, leading to a lawsuit. Julie Saraceno, via Reuters
In New Mexico, a photographer declined to take pictures of a lesbian couple’s commitment ceremony. In Washington State, a florist would not provide flowers for a same-sex wedding. And in Colorado, a baker refused to make a cake for a party celebrating the wedding of two men.
The business owners cited religious beliefs in declining to provide services celebrating same-sex relationships. And in each case, they were sued.
Now, as states around the nation weigh how to balance the rights of same-sex couples with those of conservative religious business owners, Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona must decide whether to sign legislation that would allow business owners to cite religious beliefs as a legal justification for denying service to same-sex couples.
The legislation, approved by lawmakers on Thursday, immediately attracted national attention, with conservative religious groups welcoming it as a necessary form of protection for objectors to same-sex marriage, and gay rights groups denouncing it as a license for discrimination. The measure comes at a time when the courts are grappling with how to define the religious rights of private businesses: The Supreme Court is to hear two cases next month in which businesses are seeking exemptions from providing insurance coverage for contraception to their employees, citing the religious beliefs of the companies’ owners.
Representative Justin Pierce favors an Arizona bill that would let religious beliefs be a legal justification for denying service. Michael Schennum/The Arizona Republic, via Associated Press
“In America, people should be free to live and work according to their faith, and the government shouldn’t be able to tell us we can’t do that,” said Joseph E. La Rue, the legal counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal organization based in Scottsdale, Ariz., that advocates religious liberty and supports the measure passed by the State Legislature. “Faith shouldn’t be something we have to leave inside our house.”
But civil libertarians and gay rights advocates say there is a difference between protections for clergy and houses of worship that do not want to participate in same-sex marriage and the obligations of business owners that serve the general public.
“Religious freedom is a fundamental right, but it’s not a blank check to harm others or impose our faith on our neighbors,” said Daniel Mach, who directs a program on freedom of religion and belief for the American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes the Arizona legislation. “Over the years, we as a nation have rejected efforts to invoke religion to justify discrimination in the marketplace, and there’s no reason to turn back the clock now.”
Ms. Brewer, who has taken no public position on the legislation that will reach her desk next week, is a Republican whose tenure has been punctuated by controversy and political discord over a tough measure on illegal immigrants, which was denounced from the left, and a Medicaid expansion, which was criticized by the right.
Last year she vetoed a similar religious freedom bill, arguing that it was a distraction from priorities lawmakers had yet to address, including the state budget. And there are similar circumstances this year, as legislators have yet to act on a package of proposed changes to the state’s child welfare system, which has been plagued by a slow response to complaints of abuse and neglect.
Chuck Coughlin, a public affairs consultant who led Ms. Brewer’s transition team after she was elected governor in 2009 and has remained a close ally, said he was doubtful that she would sign the bill into law, saying, “We already have laws to sufficiently protect people’s religion freedoms in this country, and this bill could actually empower people to discriminate.”
The bill comes at an awkward time for Ms. Brewer, who has been eager to move beyond controversy in her last year in office (term limits prevent her from running for re-election.)
She has tried to focus on revitalizing the state’s economy, which is struggling in spite of a rebound of the housing market. The state, which was boycotted by some over the immigration measure, is preparing to host next year’s Super Bowl, and some residents worry that the religious freedom measure could again spur a backlash.
The bill is headed to the desk of Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican who has taken no public position on the legislation. Bebeto Matthews/Associated Press
In a letter to Ms. Brewer on Friday, Gonzalo A. de la Melena Jr., president and chief executive of the Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, said the bill, if it becomes law, would “ultimately have the effect of casting Arizona in a negative light that stands to damage our reputation nationwide and globally, and significantly harm our fiscal future.”
It was just one in a chorus of pleas that the governor to veto the legislation.
“It sounds like it’s opening the door to hate and bigotry of all stripes,” said Rocco DiGrazia, a Tucson pizzeria owner, who on Friday attracted national attention via social media because he had posted signs on the restaurant’s doors declaring, “We Reserve the Right to Refuse Service to Arizona Legislators.”
“I make dinner for a living — I’m not a social activist,” Mr. DiGrazia said in a telephone interview. “But I do have a lot of gay customers and employees, and why are you trying to alienate these people?”
But supporters of the legislation said they would also work hard to persuade Ms. Brewer to sign the measure, in part by disputing much of the criticism it has faced.
Most states where same-sex marriage is legal have exemptions for religious organizations, but not for private businesses or individuals, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The Arizona measure comes as multiple states are considering such exemptions, with considerable controversy. In Tennessee, the legislature is considering an exemption for wedding vendors; in Kansas, a similar measure was set aside when conservative senators raised concerns about discrimination. In Oregon, opponents of same-sex marriage are seeking to place an initiative on this year’s ballot that would allow individuals or businesses to opt out of participating in same-sex wedding ceremonies.
Supporters and opponents of the Arizona legislation do not agree on its potential impact. The supporters say it would simply tweak an existing religious freedom law in Arizona to make it clear that private individuals can use religious freedom as a defense in civil litigation; the opponents say it would allow business owners to discriminate against anyone they do not like, citing religious freedom.
“There is significant fear it will undermine local nondiscrimination laws,” said Sarah Warbelow, the state legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy organization. “This is not about the freedom of individuals to practice their religion, this is about a license to discriminate against individuals.”
But Josh Kredit, legal counsel of the Center for Arizona Policy, a conservative group that supported the bill, said that Arizona has for years had a religious freedom law that has not been used to justify discrimination, and that the changes to that law made by the new measure are “vitally needed to ensure that in America people are free to live and work according to their faith.”
“Arizona should be known as a state that welcomes people of faith and protects them,” he said. “These are intentional, purposeful distractions to try to kill this bill.”

Meeting Of Nassau OTB Board-Of-Directors

Meeting Of The Nassau OTB Board-Of-Directors
Date:
02/25/2014

Time:
9:30 AM

Description:
A public meeting of the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the NASSAU OFF-TRACK BETTING CORPORATION will be held on Tuesday, February 25th at 9:30AM at the Race Palace in Plainview, which is a handicapped-accessible facility.

Location:
The Race Palace is located at 1600 Round Swamp Road, Plainview, NY (off the L.I.E. at exit 48).

Contact:
Judy Czak
Phone: 516-572-2800 Ext: 136

Bob Corker, R. Tenn says that's my boy


 Suffolk County Legislator Kevin McCaffrey whose union's pension plan awaits takeover by the PBGC



Suffolk County Legislator Kevin McCaffrey,
 represents Nassau OTB (a public benefit corporation) employees, as he is also President of Teamsters Local 707, a largely insolvent union with an insolvent pension plan, backed by the PBGC
We hope Bob Corker (R., Tenn.) comes to Nassau OTB to speak with federal taxpayers who wonder what will happen when the PBGC lacks the resources to payout the liabilities incurred by the failed multiemployer pension plans.  See you at Nassau OTB Bob Corker.

"It will be a tough one to win. How do you tell public officials they can't speak on this subject?" Mr. Schwartz asked. "In reality it wasn't the company they had to worry about. It was the overall attitude of the community toward unions."

Long Island Business News
Suffolk, Nassau OTB probe ethics conflict
by David Winzelberg
Published: November 24th, 2013

At least one employee of Nassau County Off-Track Betting is questioning whether the head of his employee union, a member-elect of the Suffolk County Legislature, should have a say in Suffolk OTB business.
Teamsters Local 707 President Kevin McCaffery, whose union represents about 200 Nassau OTB workers, was elected earlier this month to serve as a Suffolk legislator representing the 14th District. In a letter last week, Nassau OTB cashier Jackson Leeds alerted the Suffolk County Ethics Board to McCaffery’s possible conflict of interest.
“As a Suffolk County legislator, his duties are to the people of Suffolk County,” Leeds wrote. “He cannot simultaneously represent the interests of employees of Nassau OTB, a Nassau County public benefit corporation.”
McCaffery told LIBN he doesn’t think the two counties’ OTBs are in competition with each other and he doesn’t see his role as union leader for Nassau OTB workers as a conflict with issues surrounding Suffolk OTB.
“If anything, I have the background of dealing with Nassau OTB, which gives me more insight on the subject than any other legislator out there,” McCaffery said.
When asked if the legislator-elect’s union job appeared to be a conflict of interest, Nassau OTB chief Joseph Cairo said, “If you really want to stretch it. But I don’t see anything that’s apparent to me.”
Cairo added that he’ll instruct the Nassau agency’s counsel to review the situation.
Leeds, a 10-year veteran of Nassau OTB, complained that both union officials and county OTB management have been too focused on the 1,000 video lottery terminals planned for each county’s OTB and they’re not paying enough attention to current operations.
“They never worked behind a window,” Leeds told LIBN. “They’re out of touch with the bettors of Nassau County.”
Internet wagering and dwindling handles – the overall money being wagered – have prompted a consolidation in Nassau OTB’s operations in recent years; there were 15 betting offices in Nassau in 2003, and now there are eight. Suffolk OTB, which has seven branch offices, filed for bankruptcy last year.
These days, according to some analysts, OTB offices exist largely for political patronage – another reason, according to Leeds, that the Nassau union chief shouldn’t mix one business with the other.
“Union leaders should not be politicians,” he said. “OTBs are run by politicians. Being political and doing public good aren’t always incompatible, but they often are.”
This isn’t the first time a Long Island legislator’s OTB ties have become an issue.
In May 2000, Gregory Peterson, then-president of the Nassau OTB, sued to prevent Nassau County Leg. Roger Corbin from voting on appointments to the Nassau OTB’s board of directors. Because Corbin was employed as a branch manager for New York City OTB and a member of Teamsters Local 858, which then represented all employees of Nassau OTB, Peterson alleged Corbin’s legislative role posed a conflict of interest.
A New York Supreme Court judge issued an injunction preventing Corbin from voting on OTB appointments, but Corbin appealed and the lower court’s decision was reversed. The Nassau County Board of Ethics also chimed in, determining by a 3-2 vote that voting on OTB appointments didn’t create a conflict because Corbin didn’t influence policy or engage in labor negotiations.
With McCaffery, some observers say it’s best to proceed with caution.
Anthony Figliola, vice president of Uniondale-based government relations firm Empire Government Strategies, said the legislator-elect may want to recuse himself from any votes concerning Suffolk OTB until the Suffolk County Ethics Board offers an opinion.
“OTB is a political football,” Figliola said. “It’s better to stay out of it, especially if you want to get things done in the Legislature.”


David Winzelberg
Reporter
631.913.4247
917.796.1801

HOME : NEWS ROOM : NEWS


CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. – U.S. Senator Bob Corker, R-Tenn., today released the following statement regarding the UAW filing an appeal with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on last week’s election at Chattanooga’s Volkswagen plant.
“The workers at Chattanooga's Volkswagen plant spoke very clearly last week, so we are disappointed the UAW is ignoring their decision and has filed this objection. Unfortunately, I have to assume that today's action may slow down Volkswagen’s final discussions on the new SUV line,” said Corker. “This complaint affirms the point many of us have been making: that the UAW is only interested in its own survival and not the interests of the great employees at Chattanooga’s Volkswagen facility nor the company for which they work.”
As mayor of Chattanooga from 2001-2005, Corker worked with officials and community leaders to develop the 1,200 acre Enterprise South Industrial Park, which is now home to Volkswagen's North American manufacturing headquarters. Much of the negotiation that led to Volkswagen choosing Chattanooga occurred around the dining room table of Corker’s Chattanooga home.
###






Business

UAW Asks NLRB to Review Vote at VW

Union Asks Board to Consider New Vote, Saying Lawmakers Interfered

Updated Feb. 21, 2014 4:13 p.m. ET
Labor lawyers said there is little precedent for the NLRB to consider objections to organizing elections based on third-party interference. Above,the company's factory in Chattanooga, Tenn. Bloomberg
The United Auto Workers union has asked a federal labor agency to consider holding another vote at a Tennessee Volkswagen AG VLKAY -2.98% plant, contending interference by Republican lawmakers and others prompted workers there last week to reject union representation.
The UAW filed its request on Friday with the National Labor Relations Board, a quasi-judicial federal labor agency that supervises union elections and referees private-sector workplace disputes. The request—known officially as an objection to the election—could lead to a new election.
The NLRB will review the UAW's objections, a spokesman said.
Workers at the Volkswagen assembly plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., rejected UAW representation 712-626 in a stinging setback for the union and for organized labor as its seeks to increase its membership, especially in Southern states.
In its request, the UAW cites what it calls "a coordinated and widely-publicized coercive campaign" by politicians and outside organizations to deprive Volkswagen workers of their federally protected right to join a union "free of coercion, intimidation, threats and interference."
Labor lawyers said there is little precedent for the NLRB to consider objections to organizing elections based on third-party interference. Typically allegations of meddling are aimed at the company, said Art Schwartz, president of Labor and Economics Associates, Ann Arbor, Mich., consultants.
"It will be a tough one to win. How do you tell public officials they can't speak on this subject?" Mr. Schwartz asked. "In reality it wasn't the company they had to worry about. It was the overall attitude of the community toward unions."
The document names U.S. Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.), Gov. Bill Haslam and about a half-dozen other senior state officials, accusing them and their staff of coordinating "publicly announced and widely disseminated threats." Most of the statements, the UAW said, "centered on a threatened loss of state financial incentives" for Volkswagen of America expansion in Chattanooga if the union was elected. "And these threats were clearly designed to influence" workers, it added.
It cited remarks by Mr. Corker saying he had been assured by Volkswagen that if workers voted against the union, Chattanooga would win a new sport-utility vehicle line. Company officials later said there was no connection between the two.
UAW and other union officials have called the 53% to 47% vote "narrow," and said it would have been swung with 44 more votes in favor of the union.
"It is extraordinary interference in the private decision of workers to have a U.S. senator, a governor and leaders of the state legislature threaten the company with the denial of economic incentives and workers with a loss of product," UAW President Bob King said in a statement on Friday. "We're committed to standing with the Volkswagen workers to ensure that their right to have a fair vote without coercion and interference is protected," he said.
David Smith, a spokesman for Gov. Haslam, didn't comment directly on the appeal, saying only that "the governor is focused on working with Volkswagen on future growth in Tennessee."
Sen. Corker said in a written statement that the plant workers "spoke very clearly last week, so we are disappointed the UAW is ignoring their decision." Mr. Corker said the filing could slow Volkswagen's final discussions on where to locate the SUV line.
"This complaint affirms the point many of us have been making: that the UAW is only interested in its own survival and not the interests of the great employees at Chattanooga's Volkswagen facility nor the company for which they work," Mr. Corker said.
Volkswagen declined to comment on the filing. The vote occurred between Feb. 12 and Feb. 14.
Union officials are convinced that Mr. Corker's statement about the SUV line influenced the outcome, a person briefed on the union's thinking said. The UAW was running a phone-bank campaign during the election, and in the days just before the vote heard from VW employees who once were in favor of a union swaying more neutral or to "no," this person said.
Another person who has been advising workers opposed to the UAW said about 1,000 of the 1,300 votes were cast last Wednesday before Mr. Corker went public with the statement that the plant would get an SUV even if the UAW loses the election.
—Neal Boudette, Christina Rogers and Siobhan Hughes contributed to this article.
Write to Melanie Trottman at melanie.trottman@wsj.com

U.A.W. Asks Labor Board to Examine Vote at Tennessee Plant ...

www.nytimes.com/.../uaw-asks-labor-board-to-exami...
The New York Times
2 days ago - By STEVEN GREENHOUSE FEB. 21, 2014 ... 16, 2014 · Workers at the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., worked on the assembly of ...

In a statement, the U.A.W. said the anti-union campaign included “widely disseminated threats by elected officials that state-financed incentives would be withheld if workers exercised their protected right to form a union.”
The union cited a statement that Mr. Corker made on the first day of voting: “I’ve had conversations today and based on those am assured that should the workers vote against the U.A.W., Volkswagen will announce in the coming weeks will that it will manufacture its new midsize S.U.V. here in Chattanooga.”
In its complaint, the union called Mr. Corker’s conduct “shameful.” It added, that the clear message of Mr. Corker and other lawmakers “was that voting for the union would result in stagnation for the Chattanooga plant, with no new product, no job security, and withholding of state support for its expansion.”
The labor board’s regional officials will now investigate the union’s objections.
Mr. Corker responded to the union’s complaint with a statement, saying, “The workers at Chattanooga’s Volkswagen plant spoke very clearly last week, so we are disappointed the U.A.W. is ignoring their decision and has filed this objection.”
“Unfortunately,” Mr. Corker added, “I have to assume that today’s action may slow down Volkswagen’s final discussions on the new S.U.V. line. This complaint affirms the point many of us have been making: that the U.A.W. is only interested in its own survival and not the interests of the great employees at Chattanooga’s Volkswagen facility nor the company for which they work.”
The union argues that the politicians deprived the VW workers of their federal right to an election “free of coercion, intimidation, threats and interference.”



HOME : CONTACT INFORMATION : STAFF DIRECTORY

Washington Office
425 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, D.C., 20510
Main: 202-224-3344
Fax: 202-228-0566

Administration

Todd Womack, Chief of Staff
Hallie Williams, Scheduler
Erica Frye, Assistant to the Chief of Staff

Constituent ServicesDavid Dudik, Operations Director
Ashton Davis, Constituent Services Representative
Jenny Hamrick, Constituent Services Representative
Douglas Sellers, Staff Assistant
Owen Mercer, Staff Assistant
Santo Giordano, Systems Administrator

LegislationRob Strayer, Legislative Director and General Counsel
John Lipsey, Chief Counsel
Michael Bright, Senior Financial Advisor (Finance, Banking, Housing)
Hunter Bethea, Legislative Assistant (Budget, Social Security, Education, Agriculture, Energy, Environment, Transportation)
James Tatgenhorst, Legislative Correspondent (Health Care, Medicaid, Medicare)
Mark White, Legislative Aide
Evan Sharber, Legislative Correspondent (Grant Support)
Sarah Ramig, Legislative Counsel
John Haley, Legislative Correspondent

Press
Jamie Corley, Press Secretary
Micah Johnson, Press Secretary

Tennessee Regional Offices


Chattanooga
10 West M.L. King Blvd., 6th Floor
Chattanooga, TN 37402
Main: 423-756-2757
Fax: 423-756-5313

Betsy Ranalli, State Director
Kelly Puckett, Constituent Services Representative/Office Administrator
Claire McVay, Outreach Coordinator and Field Representative

Jackson 
91 Stonebridge Blvd., Suite 103
Jackson, TN 38305
Main: 731-664-2294
Fax: 731-664-4670

Jennifer Weems, Senior Field Director
Dana Magneson, State Constituent Services Coordinator

Knoxville
800 Market Street, Suite 121

Knoxville, TN 37902
Main: 865-637-4180
Fax: 865-637-9886

Jane Jolley, Field Director
Rhonda Smithson, Lead Constituent Services Representative
Shelby Payne, Constituent Services Representative

Memphis
100 Peabody Place, Suite 1125

Memphis, TN 38103
Main: 901-683-1910
Fax: 901-575-3528

Nick Kistenmacher, Senior Field Director
Jeri Wheeler, Constituent Services Representative

Nashville
3322 West End Ave., Suite 610

Nashville, TN 37203
Main: 615-279-8125
Fax: 615-279-9488

Carlie Cruse, Field Director - Middle Tennessee
Katie Davis, Field Director - South Central and Upper Cumberland Tennessee
Stephanie Parsons, Constituent Services Representative
Caroline Diaz-Barriga, Constituent Services Representative

Tri-Cities
1105 East Jackson Boulevard

Jonesborough, TN 37659
Main: 423-753-2263
Fax: 423-753-3679

Jill Salyers, Field Director
Kim Cordell, Constituent Services Representative





Executive Board

January 21, 2010 Local 707 Executive board is sworn in for another 3 year term by General IBT President James P. Hoffa

Kevin McCaffrey
John Zirpoli
  Larry Cinque
 Tom Hogan
        Daniel Pacheco ~ Charles Pane ~ Mike Mc Elroy



Local 707 Highway Motor Freight
 is located at
 14 Front Street ~ 3rd Floor  
 Hempstead, NY 11550




Local 707 Upstate Union Office
is located at
948 Homestead Avenue
Route 208
 Maybrook, NY 12543
Telephone Numbers

Hempstead LI Office

Main Number: (516)486-7100

Local Union: (516)560-8509


Local Union Fax: (516)486-7164

Upstate Union Office

Main Number: (845)427-2000

Upstate Union Fax: (845)427-5507

Health, Welfare & Pension
Funds Office

Main Number: 1-800-366-3707

Funds Fax: (516)486-7375

Previous page: Home
Next page: Join The Teamsters




Latest News
Newsletter
Message
It is an honor and a privilege to serve the people of the 14th legislative district, as their Suffolk County Legislator. I am thrilled to bring my 24 years of government experience to County Government. My goals as a legislator are bringing fiscal responsibility back the Suffolk County by working to balance the budget and reduce the deficit, working to protect and improve our county’s great parks, and making sure the south shore recovers 100% from all the damage caused by Superstorm Sandy.

Please take a moment to sign up for e-mail updates, so I can keep you informed about what I am doing to help the residents of the 14th Legislative District. If you have any questions or concerns that I can be of assistance with, please do not hesitate to call my district office at 631-854-1100, my staff and I consider it an honor to work on your behalf.
Sponsored Legislation




Photo Gallery
Site Map Legal Disclaimer North County Complex Map ©2014 Suffolk County Legislature - Rev. 01/09/14