Thursday, August 27, 2015

Ny state has had election statutes struck down as unconstitutional

And reenacted only to be challenged again

Artur g Pitts protests too much

Ny state election law is a meeting of the minds 
To keep outsiders out and insiders in.

Federal judge jack Weinstein who once dispatched 
Candidates in court before he was on the federal bench is one federal judge who keeps ny pretenders in touch with a legal reality.

Trash on the books, the election law of the state of new York, must be dispatched by a higher authority even when it reappears on the books like cancer

Huntington Town Hall in an undated photo.Huntington Town Hall in an undated photo. Photo Credit: Alexi Knock
ADVERTISEMENT | ADVERTISE ON NEWSDAY
I write in response to the letter to the editor, "Judge eliminates two worthy candidates" [Aug. 16], concerning the removal of two Democratic candidates from the primary process for Huntington Town Board.
As the state Supreme Court justice assigned to adjudicate this matter, I did not remove the first candidate, Andrew Merola. His petitions were found to be insufficient by the Suffolk County Board of Elections, and he did not challenge that finding. I had nothing to do with it.
As to candidate William Naughton, his petitions were challenged by two Huntington citizens, as is their right. The petitions fell below the required number of signatures to qualify for the ballot. The rulings I made on challenged signatures were based on state election law as codified and as interpreted by higher courts.
If you don't like the laws of the state, petition your representatives to change those laws. Don't malign a judge who simply applies those laws.
Arthur G. Pitts, Riverhead
ADVERTISEMENT | ADVERTISE ON NEWSDAY
Editor's note: The writer has been a Superior Court judge in New York for more than 22 years.

Sign up for the Opinion newsletter and get the latest analysis delivered to your inbox.

Dear Stephen ruth team up with pope Francis to make a point

Nassau and Suffolk otb cannot close on Roman Catholic Easter Sunday in preference to
Greek Orthodox Easter Sunday.  See also ny cons tart 1 sec 3

People should be able to bet, work or pray as they wish.

Please help!

If bettors are turned away the counties will suck cash in other ways.

Ny pml sec 109 is unconstitutional, vague, indefinite and or overly broad.


It is a crime that bettors are not free to do as they wish!




Stephen Ruth, charged with tampering with red-light cameras, defends actions

169 Reprints  + -
Stephen Ruth, 42, is charged with four counts of third-degree criminal tampering and four counts of second-degree obstruction of governmental administration after he used an expandable painter's pole to push cameras toward the sky, away from vehicles going through the intersections, police said. (Credit: James Carbone and News 12 Long Island)
ADVERTISEMENT | ADVERTISE ON NEWSDAY
To ticket-weary motorists, he's the "Red Light Robin Hood." To police, he's just a criminal.
Stephen Ruth, the Centereach man accused of tampering with several red-light cameras in Ronkonkoma, brazenly posted a how-to video on YouTube and boasted about his civil disobedience on Facebook, police said.
In an interview Wednesday, Ruth, 42, freely admitted to tampering with the cameras to end a perceived money grab.
STORYHero or scofflaw? Readers on alleged camera tampererSEE ALSOPoll: Do you agree LIers are 'abused' by red light cams?
"It's abusive and it's got to stop," said Ruth, who said he is a landlord with several rental properties in the area. "My taxes have doubled . . . They keep taking more and more money from people. When is enough enough?"
As Ruth spoke to reporters on the side of the road in Centereach -- near one of the cameras he adjusted -- motorists honked and shouted encouragement. "You're the Red Light Robin Hood!" one man yelled. "Keep it up!"
Several visitors to Ruth's Facebook page yesterday applauded his actions, with one describing the cameras as "government spying."
ADVERTISEMENT | ADVERTISE ON NEWSDAY
Another posted: "I love you!"
Suffolk police say the cameras are mounted in locations with high rates of crashes and that by tampering with them, Ruth jeopardized public safety.
He is charged with four counts of third-degree criminal tampering and four counts of second-degree obstruction of governmental administration. Police said he used an expandable painter's pole to tilt cameras skyward, away from vehicles going through the intersections.
The tampering charges are each punishable by up to 3 months in jail, while the obstruction charges are each punishable by up to 1 year in jail.
"The primary reason for these red-light cameras is public safety," said Lt. Milagros Soto, commanding officer of the Sixth Precinct Crime Section. "They're not placed at these intersections arbitrarily. They're placed in locations that have high incidents of crashes. By him tampering with these cameras, not only did he commit a crime, but he also posed a potential danger to motorists."
Ruth said he knew he'd be arrested after his posts on social media, but felt he had to "take a stand."
He said the camera system improperly tickets motorists who stop -- but for less than 3 seconds -- before making a right on red. He hopes his arrest helps spur legislation that curbs red-light ticketing.
Officials said Ruth has been cited for red-light-camera violations 10 times between December 2010 and June 2015, but Ruth maintains that he's been ticketed for not stopping long enough -- even when there's no approaching cars.
ADVERTISEMENT | ADVERTISE ON NEWSDAY
Police said Ruth twice tampered with a camera in Ronkonkoma, at Ocean Avenue and the Long Island Expressway South Service Road -- on Friday and Monday.
Acting on anonymous tips, officers arrested Ruth at his home about 4 p.m. Tuesday. About 15 minutes earlier, he had boasted on Facebook about tampering that day with two cameras at Hawkins Avenue and the LIE South Service Road, also in Ronkonkoma, police said.
Ruth had also posted a video showing visitors to his page how to use a pole to render the cameras useless. The post had more than 230,000 views by about 8 a.m.
"I'm going to show you how easy it is to take the power back," he says in the video. "It doesn't take more than a minute to do this and the gratification . . . is huge."
After making a camera adjustment, he proclaims: "I just saved people about $10,000 today . . ."
ADVERTISEMENT | ADVERTISE ON NEWSDAY
Ruth is scheduled to be arraigned on the charges Oct. 27 in Suffolk District Court.
Newsday reported in 2014 that Suffolk has 189 cameras at 90 intersections. Revenue from the red-light-camera program jumped nearly 80 percent in 2013 to more than $17 million, as the county added new intersections to the program and a $30 fee to tickets, according to the most recent statistics released by the county.

The best of Newsday every day in your inbox. Get the Newsday Now newsletter!