Thursday, November 28, 2013

Give Thanks that you are not like Andrew

 
Cuomo who discriminates against New Yorkers based on his own religious 
beliefs. Nasau OTB must be open 365 days of the year for bettors and people who may
choose to work while others may chose to pray.
Andrew Cuomo to Hades and New Yorkers freedom to do as they please
without the State of NY telling them when Andrew Cuomo's Holy day occurs.
NY Const. Art. 1, Sec. 3 trumps the Andrew Cuomo Turkey.
 
(If this message is not displaying properly, click here to launch your browser.)
From the Office of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo
Dear Fellow New Yorker,
As New Yorkers gather this Thanksgiving, we reflect on the blessings of the past year and celebrate the spirit of giving.
With the holiday season upon us, New York State is stepping up to help food banks and soup kitchens across the state stock their shelves and feed those in need.
Earlier this week, the Governor announced $4.5 million in grants to help 2,600 emergency food providers throughout New York State provide 2.8 million meals. These state grants will help provide vital relief to 3.1 million New Yorkers impacted by the recent cuts to federal SNAP benefits.
All New Yorkers are encouraged to join our efforts by donating food or volunteering their time at local food banks and soup kitchens this holiday season.  Learn more about how you can help by clicking here.
As we celebrate the spirit of generosity and kindness that keeps our state strong and united, we wish all New Yorkers a happy and blessed Thanksgiving.
Sincerely,
The Office of the Governor

Governor Cuomos Facebook Page Governor Cuomos Twitter Feed
Governor Cuomos Facebook Page



This is a message from the New York State Executive Chamber, State Capitol, Albany, NY 12224.
If you'd prefer not to receive e-mail like this, please click here for our unsubscribe options.



HI-
Thanks for the help. The item’s below. I’d be happy to mail you a copy, if you give me a mailing address.

Claude Solnik
(631) 913-4244
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348 

Home > LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays

Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012



Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.


Wednesday, November 27, 2013

leasing details on Nassau OTB

Green Acres.
The bettors who frequent the Green Acres Branch of Nassau OTB and Nassau OTB employees in general and the taxpayers of Nassau OTB wish that the Green Acres Branch of Nassau OTB has a long and healthy existence.


Please advise us of the current and likely future state of the Green Acres Branch lease.





Find a Store/Restaurant

Location & Hours

2034 Green Acres Mall
Sunrise Highway
Valley Stream, NY 11581
(516) 561-1157
Get Directions
Mon-Sat: 10am-9:30pm
Sun: 11am-7pm
Holiday Hours

Leasing Opportunities

Green Acres Mall

Gross Lease Area: 2,025,793 square feet
Major Retailers: American Eagle Outfitters, Best Buy, BJ's, Express, Forever 21, G by Guess, H&M, Old Navy, Victoria's Secret Beauty

Contact Information

Elisha Yearwood
Elisha Yearwood
Leasing Development
(516) 561-7360
elisha.yearwood@macerich.com

Guy Mercurio
Guy Mercurio
VP, National Restaurant Leasing ( >3,000 sq. ft. )
(214) 373-5200
guy.mercurio@macerich.com

Eric Bunyan
Eric Bunyan
Senior Manager, Peripheral Development
(214) 373-5271 x21
eric.bunyan@macerich.com

Bari Cohen
Bari Cohen
Senior Manager, Leasing
(718) 592-7658 x33
bari.cohen@macerich.com

Justin Cole
Justin Cole
Senior Manager, Leasing
(718) 592-7658
justin.cole@macerich.com

Dustin Rand
Dustin Rand
Senior Manager, Leasing
(718) 592-7658
dustin.rand@macerich.com

Go west young man from Freeport OTB

and you will arrive at.... Green Acres..... and if you don't find what you are looking for ask Kevin McCaffrey for directions?


Find a Macerich Center

Our Shops, Your Style

Find Your Whole Family’s Favorite Stores and Sales — All in One Place
Our Shops, Your Style

Find a Store/Restaurant

Location & Hours

2034 Green Acres Mall
Sunrise Highway
Valley Stream, NY 11581
(516) 561-1157
Get Directions
Mon-Sat: 10am-9:30pm
Sun: 11am-7pm
Holiday Hours

Stores You May Like

You may also be interested in these nearby stores:

Nassau Downs O.T.B

Professional betting service.
Phone: (516) 571-7272
Location: Level 1: 1F
Locate Store on Directory Map



Greek Bettors et al need not bet at Nassau

OTB because it is closed only on Roman Catholic Holidays in preference to Greek Orthodox Holidays.

Religious liberty is for people, not corporations

By Elizabeth B. Wydra
updated 7:03 PM EST, Tue November 26, 2013
Watch this video

Hobby Lobby takes on Obamacare

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Elizabeth Wydra: Supreme Court to review contraception challenge to Obamacare
  • Owners of corporations say providing that coverage violates religious freedom, she says
  • She says business owner can't shift between individual, corporate status for advantage
  • Wydra: If justices follow more than 200 years of law, they'll hand victory to Obamacare
Editor's note: Elizabeth B. Wydra is chief counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center, a public-interest law firm, think tank and action center. She regularly participates in Supreme Court litigation. Follow her on Twitter @ElizabethWydra.
(CNN) -- Once again, Obamacare has made its way back before the Supreme Court.
The high court decided Tuesday to review two challenges by for-profit corporations and their religious owners over comprehensive contraception coverage required by the Affordable Care Act. And if the justices follow more than 200 years of constitutional law and history on what it means to enjoy the free exercise of religion in America, the court should yet again hand a victory to the act.
It had little choice but to agree to hear the cases this term.
Using unprecedented legal reasoning, three federal circuit courts of appeals have ruled that secular, for-profit business corporations and/or the individuals who own them have a valid claim that the mandate to provide no-cost, FDA-approved contraception in their employer-sponsored health plan violates their asserted right to the free exercise of religion.
Two other federal circuit courts of appeals have rejected these claims; the Supreme Court frequently steps in to resolve such disagreements among the federal courts of appeals.
Unless the Supreme Court reverses these radical decisions, the consequences could reach far beyond the Affordable Care Act, making this particular roadblock for Obamacare more problematic in the long term than the well-publicized problems associated with the health exchange website's rollout.
Elizabeth B. Wydra
Elizabeth B. Wydra
By accepting the religious free-exercise claims, these three federal courts have turned first principles of religious freedom, as well as fundamental tenets of corporate law, on their head.
From the nation's founding until today, the Constitution's protection of religious liberty has been seen as a personal right, inextricably linked to the human capacity to express devotion to a God and act on the basis of reason and conscience.
Business corporations, quite properly, have never shared in this fundamental constitutional tradition for the obvious reason that a business corporation lacks the basic human capacities -- reason, dignity and conscience -- at the core of the right to free exercise of religion. Obviously not "persons" in the usual sense of the word, these corporations are also not religious organizations, which have historically received some constitutional protection and are, in fact, given exemptions from the contraception mandate.
These businesses do not hire employees on the basis of their religion and their employees are not required to share the religious beliefs personally held by the corporation's owners. In all of American history, secular, for-profit corporations have never been understood to "exercise" religion -- have you ever seen Exxon Mobil in the pew next to you at church? -- and have never been protected by the right to free exercise.
Supreme Court to hear birth control case
To be sure, the devout individual business owners behind the corporations in these challenges have their own personal rights to exercise their religion, but those rights have nothing to do with Obamacare's contraception coverage requirement. Why? Because federal law does not require the individuals who own the company to personally provide health care coverage or to satisfy any other legal obligation of the corporation. The law places requirements only on the corporate entity.
To conflate the corporations in these cases with their owners violates basic principles of corporate law.
When business owners create a corporation as the means of carrying out their business, they create a distinct legal entity with rights, obligations, privileges and liabilities that are different from the individuals who set up the corporation. This generally works to the benefit of the individual owners, which is why people choose to incorporate in the first place. And it means that certain rights specific to individuals do not carry over to the corporate form.
For example, the Supreme Court has held that an individual acting in his personal capacity has the right to "plead the Fifth" and refuse to turn over documents that could incriminate him, but that same individual acting in his official capacity as a corporate owner has no such right against self-incrimination. Like the right to the free exercise of religion, the right against self-incrimination has always been understood to be a personal right of freedom and conscience that artificial corporate entities simply do not share.
A business owner simply does not have the right to move back and forth freely between individual and corporate status to obtain all the advantages and avoid any of the disadvantages of the respective forms.
Whether you have cheered the misfortunes Obamacare has suffered over the past month or bemoaned them, the distortion of basic principles of corporate law and free exercise jurisprudence by the three federal courts that have endorsed the corporate challenges to the ACA's contraception mandate should be troubling.
The Supreme Court, as always, will have the final say.
If the justices follow more than 200 years of constitutional law and history, not to mention basic principles of corporate law, the court should hand another victory to Obamacare.
I'm sure the administration -- and more importantly, the women and their families who risk losing important health benefits to which they are legally entitled -- would welcome the win.
Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion.

Monday, November 25, 2013

and they are open 365 days of the year

Below is a very informative and well written letter by Assemblywoman Claudia Tenney which clearly outlines Andrew Cuomo's "sell out" agreement with the Onieda's which threw the taxpayers under the bus and gave the tribe hundreds of millions of dollars to save face for his father’s illegal deal to open the Casino.  The Court of Appeals declared the Casino illegal years ago but Cuomo as Attorney General did not move to close it to protect his father’s name and then he gave the farm away to the Onieda's to take the issue out of play for next year’s election.  The Onieda's threw a huge party honoring Mario a month before the settlement and invited all the establishment parasites.

                           

Dear Colleague:

            I urge you NOT to support the proposed deal with the Oneida Indian Nation (Casino Oneidas) which is a portion of the gaming legislation proposed by Governor Cuomo.  I have been very involved in this issue as a concerned citizen and also as an attorney for a genuine Oneida Indian who opposes this deal.

This bill is far more serious and has much greater ramifications than even the SAFE Act.  It is being hustled through without public comment in much the same way.  This deal actually presents bright line violations of the state and federal Constitutions in addition to numerous violations under state and federal law.  The deal actually and incredibly spells out, within the body of the agreement, provisions that are likely violations of various public corruption statutes.  I have attached a letter written by attorney Cornelius Murray, that was sent to the relevant authorities regarding the possible violation of bribery statutes.

            This deal will cause irreparable economic harm to the Central New York region and will have devastating consequences to our state and local governments as well as the business community.  No legitimate businessperson or responsible government official could support this deal.

            The Governor’s sales pitch on this deal is shameful.  He has manipulated the facts and the news media who have failed to accurately report on this issue.  For example:

1.     This deal is NOT the settlement of the 40-year land claim.  The land claim was dismissed by the Second Circuit two years ago.  The Casino Oneidas received nothing from it and the 20,000 landowners who were sued WON.  (On October 17, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the Oneida’s appeal of the 2nd Circuit Court ruling, ending the Oneida’s land claim.)
2.     The Casino Oneidas are required to pay property, sales, use and excise taxes on all operations and all sales tax to Non-Indians pursuant to decisions by the State Court of Appeals and The U.S. Supreme Court.  They currently owe in excess of $800 million in back taxes to the State and local governments. Nearly all of the Casino Oneida’s land holdings DO NOT qualify as Indian land for tax purposes.  The proposed agreement eliminates payment of tax to the State and local governments, including ALL back taxes forever.
3.     The failure to collect the taxes is purely the fault of the Governor and past Governors and the Attorney General.
4.     Noteworthy and material to this proposed ‘Settlement Agreement’ has been the lawsuit initiated by the Casino Oneidas in 2005 to take approximately 13,001 acres into a federal trust for their benefit, thereby removing these acres from State jurisdiction for unlimited commercial development (and tax free status).  This Action by the Oneidas ran into a major roadblock this past fall.  Specifically, on Sept. 24, 2012 federal Justice Lawrence Kahn effectively suspended the fee-to-trust lawsuit with the issuance of a Memorandum-Decision and Order that remanded the Department of Interior’s Record of Decision of May 20, 2008, (which had planned to give the Oneidas trust land), back to the DOI and the Bureau of Indian Affairs for further proceedings.  Additional evidence was requested by the Court to justify legal  propriety of this attempted major land grab.  The Oneidas were now being asked to prove that they were, in fact, a federally recognized tribe as of the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act, as called for by the U.S. Supreme Court Ruling of 2007 known as the Carcieri Decision.  Governor Cuomo’s ‘Settlement Agreement’ with the Casino Oneidas now appears to be a way to circumvent the suspended Record of Decision method of putting the land into a trust to the detriment of all New Yorkers. (The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 says that an Indian Casino must be on federal trust land; and, the state and federal courts have also determined that the Casino Oneidas cannot operate Class III gaming on their current site unless and until New York legalizes Class III gaming.)
5.     The Governor has an affirmative obligation, under Article 2, Section 10 of the State law, to defend the sovereign borders and jurisdiction of New York and SHALL employ and provide counsel to the defense of those claims.  The federal trust land application is an attempt to remove New York’s sovereignty and jurisdiction over its land.  This is exactly the scenario outlined in Justice Ginsberg’s Supreme Court opinion prohibiting this type of taking.  Modern litigation on this issue affirms the Governor’s obligation to do so.  Unhinging New York State will affect the civil rights of many New Yorker’s who live within, and beyond, the Casino Oneidas checkerboard-style land holdings; presently, the underlying sovereign in their deeds is that of the State of New York.
6.     During the negotiation of this ill-conceived deal, the Governor threatened to cease defending the state’s sovereignty in the federal fee-to-trust case if the local governments did not accept HIS deal.  Further, Governor Cuomo threatened to withhold monies owed to the counties due to his own failure to enforce the collection of back taxes duly owed by the Oneidas.  The threats are well-documented and even printed in local newspapers. This tactic is tantamount to extortion, and, use of taxpayer’s money to coerce is a violation of state law.  See attached letter from Oneida County Legislator Frank Tallerino and article from Oneida Daily Dispatch.
7.     The Governor completely forgives all back taxes owed of every kind which is prohibited by the State Constitution.  See attached below certain relevant sections of the New York Constitution and New York State Tax law.
8.     Under Cuomo’s deal, the Casino Oneidas only have to pay 25% on certain gaming machines.  Not all class three games operated by them are covered in the Agreement.  There are no enforcement provisions.  No securities. No guaranties of any kind.  Once the Casino Oneidas are granted federal trust land, (a legal impossibility that the Governor and an uninformed legislature will shove down our throats anyway), they can put gaming machines on any of the 25,000 acres (12,000 more than they were proposed in federal trust land) and none of the new lands will be subject to the 25% share.  Vernon Downs, just 15 minutes away, pays the equivalent of 67% of its share on gaming and complies with all state laws.
9.     No taxes will be owed for any retail sales of any kind in the future including sale of gasoline and cigarettes.  The permanent revenue stream generated by real estate taxes will also be eliminated forever.  And, nothing precludes the Casino Oneidas from eliminating, or diluting the very limited gaming machines on which the Cuomo plan hopes to profit as indicated above.
10.  The state will surrender its taxing authority in direct violation of Article 16, Section 1, of the State Constitution.  The Casino Oneidas will collect their “own” taxes to create some sort of parity.  They will keep the tax for their own “so-called” government operations.  There is no scheme, or plan, for parity on the base price of any product or service that could be sold by the Oneidas. There are less than 500 bonafide members of the tribe, representing less than .002% of Oneida County’s population.  However, the rest of the taxpayers will continue to bear the cost for Medicaid, public assistance, roads, programs for people with disabilities, education and all other expenses which all are entitled to as citizens. 
11. All Oneidas are citizens of the United States and the State of New York pursuant to the Citizenship Act of Congress of 1924.  The Oneidas are not a separate country as they falsely claim.  There is no provision for collection of internet sales tax.  One absurdity of the deal is the granting of “most favored” nation status by the State to the Casino Oneidas.  If that were in fact the case, the U.S. Constitution prohibits the state from entering into treaty-like agreements with separate nations. Additionally, the state Constitution further prohibits the state from exempting specific entities from taxation.  NY Const. Article III, Section 22.
12. The Casino Oneidas will now be granted the ability to tax stamp cigarettes and distribute them in commerce.  This sets back years of successful litigation by U.S. Attorneys throughout over the state.  This so-called deal by Cuomo is giveaway on every level and this measure alone will cost New York billions of dollars in a few short years.  The deal gives unfair and illegal tax breaks to one entity at the expense of law-abiding citizens and legitimate businesses who will suffer irreparable harm.  See NY Const. Article III, Section 22.
13. There is no credible enforcement provision in the deal for sales of cigarettes or any other item in the event the Casino Oneidas choose not to comply.  The state has had a valid compact with the Senecas, but for a long time they have refused to pay an outstanding balance estimated at over 600 million.  We face the same problem in this deal, except that this deal has even less teeth than the compact with the Seneca tribe, and, this settlement agreement will allow the Casino Oneidas to re-sell American made cigarettes and keep all taxes, including the excise tax.
14. This deal will result in an unlawful violation of the 1842 State Treaty with the Orchard Hill Band of Oneidas, a separate and distinct tribe, which preserves lots 2 and 3 for their perpetual use.  This Treaty is still valid today but the Cuomo Plan will destroy it to the detriment of the genuine, longstanding Oneida tribe.  This separate Band of Oneidas will be forced from their land in violation of the treaty and several state and federal provisions protecting the rights of Indian Tribes residing on state land.  See attached document from Federal Archives showing that Halbritter and his ancestors are not members of the Six Nations Confederacy and thus, have no attachment to the land for rights.
15. The CEO of Oneida Indian Nation, Ray Halbritter (not eligible to be a chief) reputedly owns an oil and gas drilling company with 180 natural gas drilling leases ‘ready to go’ for wells located within the lands proposed to be placed into a federal trust.  If the land is placed into trust, he will be able to engage in any type of hydraulic fracturing on those wells regardless of the state moratorium.  The DEC will have no regulatory authority, and, no taxes or fees will be paid to the state for the sale of any natural gas extracted.  There has been no SEQRA or NEPA review whatsoever.
16. The Cuomo deal does not address easements and rights-of-way, including the fact that the New York State Thruway (I-90) will cross through what will be Indian Country, and it appears that major power line corridors from Niagara Falls, which benefit New York City, and elsewhere, will be compromised in terms of ownership. 
17. Finally, that in addition to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Sherrill decision which provided that State citizens were to be protected under the doctrine of “Justifiable Expectations,” a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision ruled that once land is transferred from federal jurisdiction to state jurisdiction, it cannot go back to federal jurisdiction, (see Hawaii et. al v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs et. al, No. 07-1372, Decided March 31, 2009).  There has never been Federal Indian Trust land in New York or in any of the original colonies.  The Indian owned casinos in Connecticut and Rhode Island are on state sovereign land. 
Halbritter and the Casino Oneidas are desperate and this deal will erase all the hard fought rights our communities have gained in the state and federal courts for next to nothing.  We have a royal flush and they have a pair of twos with all cards showing on the table.  Why are we folding?  Worse, we are literally giving away our community to a defiant and corrupt dictator who runs an entity that flaunts our laws and refuses to comply.

We have been bullied by Governor Cuomo and Halbritter and one has to wonder why the Governor or any responsible person could go along with this horrible deal unless that person is completely uninformed or utterly corrupt.  This is a tragedy of epic proportions for the people of Central New York.

I have attached numerous documents that should compel you to vote against this ill-conceived deal.  The People of the State of New York deserve adequate protection, not a railroad job.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
      Thank you.
                                                                        Sincerely,

                                                                        Claudia Tenney, Member of Assembly

CT/fd
Enclosures


Nassau OTB Union Members have never

received  copies of their Seniority List and have never received copies of the Seniority List as it changes.
It is noted that the date of hire of public employees and their title is a matter of public record. See eg NY Freedom of Information Law. Kevin McCaffrey is a Union Leader who should not represent citizens of Nassau County. 

Long Island Business News
Suffolk, Nassau OTB probe ethics conflict
by David Winzelberg
Published: November 24th, 2013

At least one employee of Nassau County Off-Track Betting is questioning whether the head of his employee union, a member-elect of the Suffolk County Legislature, should have a say in Suffolk OTB business.
Teamsters Local 707 President Kevin McCaffery, whose union represents about 200 Nassau OTB workers, was elected earlier this month to serve as a Suffolk legislator representing the 14th District. In a letter last week, Nassau OTB cashier Jackson Leeds alerted the Suffolk County Ethics Board to McCaffery’s possible conflict of interest.
“As a Suffolk County legislator, his duties are to the people of Suffolk County,” Leeds wrote. “He cannot simultaneously represent the interests of employees of Nassau OTB, a Nassau County public benefit corporation.”
McCaffery told LIBN he doesn’t think the two counties’ OTBs are in competition with each other and he doesn’t see his role as union leader for Nassau OTB workers as a conflict with issues surrounding Suffolk OTB.
“If anything, I have the background of dealing with Nassau OTB, which gives me more insight on the subject than any other legislator out there,” McCaffery said.
When asked if the legislator-elect’s union job appeared to be a conflict of interest, Nassau OTB chief Joseph Cairo said, “If you really want to stretch it. But I don’t see anything that’s apparent to me.”
Cairo added that he’ll instruct the Nassau agency’s counsel to review the situation.
Leeds, a 10-year veteran of Nassau OTB, complained that both union officials and county OTB management have been too focused on the 1,000 video lottery terminals planned for each county’s OTB and they’re not paying enough attention to current operations.
“They never worked behind a window,” Leeds told LIBN. “They’re out of touch with the bettors of Nassau County.”
Internet wagering and dwindling handles – the overall money being wagered – have prompted a consolidation in Nassau OTB’s operations in recent years; there were 15 betting offices in Nassau in 2003, and now there are eight. Suffolk OTB, which has seven branch offices, filed for bankruptcy last year.
These days, according to some analysts, OTB offices exist largely for political patronage – another reason, according to Leeds, that the Nassau union chief shouldn’t mix one business with the other.
“Union leaders should not be politicians,” he said. “OTBs are run by politicians. Being political and doing public good aren’t always incompatible, but they often are.”
This isn’t the first time a Long Island legislator’s OTB ties have become an issue.
In May 2000, Gregory Peterson, then-president of the Nassau OTB, sued to prevent Nassau County Leg. Roger Corbin from voting on appointments to the Nassau OTB’s board of directors. Because Corbin was employed as a branch manager for New York City OTB and a member of Teamsters Local 858, which then represented all employees of Nassau OTB, Peterson alleged Corbin’s legislative role posed a conflict of interest.
A New York Supreme Court judge issued an injunction preventing Corbin from voting on OTB appointments, but Corbin appealed and the lower court’s decision was reversed. The Nassau County Board of Ethics also chimed in, determining by a 3-2 vote that voting on OTB appointments didn’t create a conflict because Corbin didn’t influence policy or engage in labor negotiations.
With McCaffery, some observers say it’s best to proceed with caution.
Anthony Figliola, vice president of Uniondale-based government relations firm Empire Government Strategies, said the legislator-elect may want to recuse himself from any votes concerning Suffolk OTB until the Suffolk County Ethics Board offers an opinion.
“OTB is a political football,” Figliola said. “It’s better to stay out of it, especially if you want to get things done in the Legislature.”


David Winzelberg
Reporter
631.913.4247
917.796.1801

Sunday, November 24, 2013

nassau county buys first nuclear sub

Proposed Multi-Year Financial Plan 2013-2016 - Nassau County

www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/omb/.../MYP13-16Proposed.pdf‎
The out-year gaps identified in this Proposed 2013-2016 MYP are smaller in scale than .... TO - OTB 5% TAX .... A recent Newsday article on the improvement of.