Sunday, April 7, 2019

chigao police & smollett commen andrew cuomo

for nit asking his black lawyer for a FREE FORMAL OPINION  as to the constitutionality of NY PML SEC 109 and its applicability to NASSAU OTB



Cuomo & Co’s next special-interest payoff

Friday, April 5, 2019



Sunday, April 21, 2019




Track CodeTrack NameEntryScratch1st Post
ET
1st Post
Local
Time
Zone
Stakes Race(s)Stakes GradeT.V.
Indicator
GGGOLDEN GATE FIELDS48243:45 PM12:45 PMPDT
LSLONE STAR PARK7203:35 PM2:35 PMCDT
SASANTA ANITA PARK72243:30 PM12:30 PMPDT
SUNSUNLAND PARK16802:30 PM12:30 PMMDT
WOWOODBINE7248


As if all the new taxes and fees passed last week as part of the state budget aren’t painful enough, lawmakers are poised to pass yet another tax soon, though this one will be hidden.
It’s an expansion of the “prevailing wage,” a government-set rate for construction jobs. It now applies only to government work (building schools etc.), but Gov. Cuomo is bent on expanding the rule to cover projects that get public subsidies.
The name is badly misleading, as Empire Center fiscal expert E.J. McMahon notes. It’s not really “prevailing”: The rate’s usually equivalent to union pay scales. And it impacts benefits as well as wages.
And, as McMahon and others have found, prevailing-wage laws add as much as 25 percent to the cost of a project, an extra charge passed on to the public via higher prices or rents (even if folks don’t realize it). That’s why it counts as a (hidden) tax.
Lawmakers pass such laws to suck up to labor — which loves them because they drive up pay and benefits and squash competitors that may otherwise outbid union contractors. In exchange, the pols get union donations and political backing. A win-win for everyone . . . except taxpayers.
Yet slapping projects that get public goodies (tax breaks or other subsidies) with new costs defeats the very point of those goodies: to encourage development. When city pols tried to force a “living wage” requirement on a plan to turn the Kingsbridge Armory in The Bronx into a mall, the builder simply walked away.
The Don’t Block NY Building Coalition rightly warns that the gov’s proposal would “undoubtedly” halt projects, “cost countless jobs and opportunities for New York families” and make it “even more difficult to do business in the Empire State.”
Yet Cuomo insists lawmakers OK it before the legislative session ends in June. The main hold-up is over whether to exempt builders whose subsidy is below a certain level. (Cuomo’s “compromise”: Let his Labor Department set the amount.)

Prosecutor defends dropping charges against Jussie Smollett

CHICAGO — The Chicago prosecutor whose office dismissed charged against Jussie Smollett defended the decision on Saturday, saying the “Empire” actor was treated no differently than thousands of other defendants whose charges were similarly dropped since she took office.
Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx made the comments during a defiant and emotional address at the Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.’s Rainbow Push Coalition. Foxx openly wondered if her race had something to do with the harsh criticism she’s faced since her office announced that charges against Smollett had been dropped. The actor was accused of staging what he claimed to be a racist and homophobic attack in January.
“I have been asking myself for the last two weeks what is this really about,” she said. “As someone who has lived in this city, who came up in the projects of this city to serve as the first African American woman in this role, it is disheartening to me … that when we get in these positions somehow the goalposts change.”
Foxx, who recused herself from the case after she communicating with a Smollett relative during the probe, reiterated that she welcomes of an independent investigation into the way she and her office handled the case. She also reminded the audience that her office did the same thing for the nearly 6,000 low-level defendants who had their charges dropped with “deferred prosecution” during her tenure.
Further, she said that under the law, Smollett could be fined a maximum of $10,000 and that the actor did pay that amount because his $10,000 bond was forfeited.
But Foxx did not address specifics of the case, or the criticism leveled by legal experts and others who said it was highly unusual not to require an admission of guilt by Smollett, particularly since at the time they dropped charges, prosecutors said they believed they could have proven the charges against the actor.
“In my 48 years of practice, I certainly have never seen a deferred prosecution done like that,” Richard Kling, an IIT-Kent Law School professor told the Chicago Sun-Times last week.
Foxx also responded to the calls by various critics to resign, saying that she will complete her term that ends next year and has plans to run for re-election.

Fact is, at any level this is just another hit on severely overtaxed New Yorkers, one that will directly cripple development and cost jobs, to boot.
Once again, the general public loses while special inte

No comments:

Post a Comment