Monday, February 3, 2014

trying to keep up with the Teamsters

Local 707 and 858 and NYC OTB and Suffolk County Legislator Kevin McCaffrey

A Long Fight to Get What Was Theirs, in a 401(k)

Five years, two articles in this space, assistance from the Labor Department and the Internal Revenue Service and prodding from one no-nonsense bankruptcy judge — that’s what it took for owners of the 401(k) plan sponsored by Penn Specialty Chemicals to gain access to their money last month.
Finally, these 401(k) holders have been released from the limbo where they’d been trapped since their company filed for bankruptcy in December 2008.
While such fiascos don’t occur everyday, the Penn Specialty Chemicals 401(k) case shows what can happen to account holders if their company collapses. It’s not a pretty picture.
When a company goes bankrupt, the assets of its 401(k) are supposed to be transferred to account holders promptly. But that didn’t happen here.
After the bankruptcy filing by Penn Specialty, a chemicals maker based in Memphis, its 401(k) holders were not only frozen out of their funds for five years, but were also charged significant fees for administrative and legal work during that time. Some of the participants even faced tax penalties because they couldn’t withdraw some of their money at age 70 1/2, as tax law requires.
Launch media viewer
Minh Uong/The New York Times
George L. Miller, a certified public accountant at Miller Coffey Tate in Philadelphia, was appointed trustee by the bankruptcy court to oversee the Penn Specialty 401(k). For years, he told plan participants that the I.R.S. had not issued a so-called determination letter that would have allowed the plan’s assets to be distributed.
But it wasn’t clear why the I.R.S. would object. The I.R.S. manual notes that bankruptcy is usually enough evidence to support a plan’s termination and payout.
Fees for administration of the 401(k), meanwhile, piled up. During 2009 and 2010, for example, fees of $111,463 were charged, or 2.8 percent of the plan’s roughly $4 million in employee assets.
The fees went to the overseers of the plan — Mr. Miller and a consulting firm in Melville, N.Y., called the Comprehensive Consulting Group. But in 2011, Vanguard, the plan’s record keeper, stopped paying the overseers after receiving what it said were unsatisfactory answers to questions it had asked about the delays in paying out participants.
Calls to Mr. Miller and to the Comprehensive Consulting Group last week were not returned.
Shankar Iyer, 72, was principal scientist at Penn A Kem, a European chemicals company that acquired some of the operations of Penn Specialty before it folded. After a year of waiting to get at his retirement account, Mr. Iyer began asking the trustee, the I.R.S. and the Labor Department what was taking so long. He took up the fight to unlock the 401(k) for himself and for the roughly 40 other participants in the plan.
In 2012, the Labor Department opened an investigation into the case. This seemed to annoy Mr. Miller, who Mr. Iyer said told him that involving Labor Department officials would result in an even longer wait and additional costs for plan participants.
Mr. Iyer, who has glaucoma and diabetes, retired last fall. He said he continued working far longer than planned because he could not withdraw any of his retirement savings — 41 years’ worth that he had earned at a variety of companies but had rolled over into his Penn Specialty account. He was also upset by the $49,728 in administrative and legal fees extracted from his account while it was in limbo. Those fees ranged from 1.5 percent to 3.75 percent of his account’s balance when they were charged.
On Jan. 24, 2013, the I.R.S. sent a determination letter to Comprehensive Consulting, stating that the plan’s assets could be distributed to participants.
Even that did not end Mr. Iyer’s battle. When he telephoned Comprehensive Consulting to ask for his money, he said, he was told that it had not received the letter, which an official at the I.R.S. confirmed it had sent.
Finally, last August, an exasperated Mr. Iyer wrote a letter seeking help from Brendan Linehan Shannon, the federal bankruptcy judge in the district of Delaware who oversaw the Penn Specialty bankruptcy years earlier. On Sept. 5, the judge called Mr. Miller and other interested parties to a hearing in his chambers 11 days later. A lawyer for the Labor Department attended; Mr. Iyer was patched in by telephone from Tennessee. Two lawyers representing Mr. Miller, the trustee, were also there; they said the delay was the fault of the Labor Department. The judge directed the trustee to resolve the matter within two months.
That deadline passed with no payout. On Nov. 26, Mr. Iyer advised the judge, who ordered Mr. Miller’s lawyer to resolve the case within a week.
In early December, Mr. Iyer and all the plan participants finally received word that the money was on its way. After five years, one month and 11 days, Mr. Iyer’s funds were released in mid-January.
“I got most of my money but I lost quite a bit,” Mr. Iyer said. “It is interesting to note that the fees I ended up paying exceed what Penn Specialty Chemicals contributed on my account. I have learned never to trust a 401(k).”
Who knows how long the Penn Specialty employees might have had to wait, were it not for the help of Judge Shannon and two federal agencies? And who knows how much the participants would have paid if Vanguard had not intervened on their behalf?
We do know, from Jason Surbey, a spokesman at the Labor Department, that the fees charged to the plan would have been larger had it not pushed the trustee to reduce what he sought to charge the plan.
Americans increasingly must rely on 401(k) plans to support themselves when they have finished their working lives. You can’t help wondering: Is this any way to run a retirement system?

No comments:

Post a Comment