Thursday, June 26, 2014

Mark Altschule MD ?

Photo
Dr. Arnold S. Relman in 1979 at The New England Journal of Medicine. He led it for 23 years. Credit Associated Press
Continue reading the main story Share This Page
Continue reading the main story
Dr. Arnold S. Relman, who abandoned the study of philosophy to rise to the top of the medical profession as a researcher, administrator and longtime editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, which became a platform for his early and influential attacks on the profit-driven health care system, died at his home in Cambridge, Mass., on Tuesday, his 91st birthday.
His wife, Dr. Marcia Angell, said the cause was melanoma.
Dr. Relman and Dr. Angell filled top editorial posts at the journal for almost a quarter-century, becoming “American medicine’s royal couple,” as the physician and journalist Abigail Zuger wrote in The New York Times in 2012.
The couple shared a George Polk Award, one of journalism’s highest prizes, for an article in 2002 in The New Republic that documented how drug companies invest far more in advertising and lobbying than in research and development.
His extended critique of the medical system was just one facet of a long and accomplished career. Dr. Relman was president of the American Federation for Clinical Research, the American Society of Clinical Investigation and the Association of American Physicians — the only person to hold all three positions. He taught and did research at Boston University, the University of Pennsylvania, Oxford and Harvard, where he was professor emeritus of medicine and social medicine.
Early in his career, he did pioneering research on kidney function.
He was also editor of The Journal of Clinical Investigation, a bible in its field, and he wrote hundreds of articles, for both professional journals and general-interest publications. Days before he died, Dr. Relman received the galleys of his final article, a review of a book on health care spending for The New York Review of Books, to which he was a frequent contributor.
In a provocative essay in the New England journal on Oct. 23, 1980, Dr. Relman, the editor in chief, issued the clarion call that would resound through his career, assailing the American health care system as caring more about making money than curing the sick. He called it a “new medical-industrial complex” — a deliberate analogy to President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s warning about a “military-industrial complex.”
His targets were not the old-line drug companies and medical-equipment suppliers, but rather a new generation of health care and medical services — profit-driven hospitals and nursing homes, diagnostic laboratories, home-care services, kidney dialysis centers and other businesses that made up a multibillion-dollar industry.
“The private health care industry is primarily interested in selling services that are profitable, but patients are interested only in services that they need,” he wrote. In an editorial, The Times said he had “raised a timely warning.”
In 2012, asked how his prediction had turned out, Dr. Relman said medical profiteering had become even worse than he could have imagined.
His prescription was a single taxpayer-supported insurance system, like Medicare, to replace hundreds of private, high-overhead insurance companies, which he called “parasites.” To control costs, he advocated that doctors be paid a salary rather than a fee for each service performed.
Dr. Relman recognized that his recommendations for repairing the health care system might be politically impossible, but he insisted that it was imperative to keep trying. Though he said he was glad that the health care law signed by President Obama in 2010 enabled more people to get insurance, he saw the legislation as a partial reform at best.
The health care system, he said, was in need of a more aggressive solution to fundamental problems, which he had discussed, somewhat philosophically, in an interview with Technology Review in 1989.
“Many people think that doctors make their recommendations from a basis of scientific certainty, that the facts are very clear and there’s only one way to diagnose or treat an illness,” he told the review. “In reality, that’s not always the case. Many things are a matter of conjecture, tradition, convenience, habit. In this gray area, where the facts are not clear and one has to make certain assumptions, it is unfortunately very easy to do things primarily because they are economically attractive.”
Dr. Relman edited The New England Journal of Medicine from 1977 to 1991. Founded in 1812, it is the oldest continuously published medical journal in the world, reaching more than 600,000 readers a week. Dr. Angell was the editor in 1999 and 2000.
When he took the journal’s helm, interest in health news was booming, and newspapers and magazines competed to be first in reporting new developments. One policy he instituted was to ask general-interest publications not to disclose a forthcoming article in advance, a request almost always honored, albeit sometimes grudgingly.
He also began requiring authors to disclose any financial arrangements that could affect their judgment in writing about the medical field, including consultancies and stock ownership.
Dr. Relman and Dr. Angell met when she was a third-year student and he was a professor at Boston University School of Medicine. They published a paper on kidney disease together in The New England Journal of Medicine, then did not see each other for years.
After he became the journal’s editor, he asked her to come on board as an editor, which she did, abandoning her career as a pathologist. They began living together in 1994 — both were divorced by then — and married in 2009.
They became the ultimate medical power couple, not least because they were gatekeepers for one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals. Their outspoken views further distinguished them.
“Some have dismissed the pair as medical Don Quixotes, comically deluded figures tilting at benign features of the landscape,” Dr. Zuger wrote in The Times. “Others consider them first responders in what has become a battle for the soul of American medicine.”
Arnold Seymour Relman was born on June 17, 1923, in Queens (in an elevator, according to Dr. Angell) and grew up in the Far Rockaway neighborhood. His father was a businessman and avid reader who inspired his son’s love of philosophy. His mother nicknamed him Buddy, and friends called him Bud the rest of his life.
He skipped grades in school and graduated at 19 from Cornell with a degree in philosophy, but he chose not to pursue the field because it “seemed sort of too arcane,” his wife said. He earned a medical degree from the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons at 22. His first marriage was to Harriet M. Vitkin.
In addition to Dr. Angell, he is survived by his sons, David and John, and a daughter, Margaret R. Batten, all from his first marriage; his stepdaughters, Dr. Lara Goitein and Elizabeth Goitein; six granddaughters; and four stepgrandsons.
Last June, Dr. Relman fell down a flight of stairs and cracked his skull, broke three vertebrae in his neck and broke more bones in his face. When he reached the emergency room, surgeons cut his neck to connect a breathing tube. His heart stopped three times.
“Technically, I died,” he told The Boston Globe.
He went on to write an article about his experience for The New York Review of Books, offering the unusual perspective of both a patient and a doctor.
“It’s both good and bad to be a doctor and to be old and sick,” he told The Globe.
“You learn to make the most of it,” he added. “Schopenhauer, the German philosopher, said life is slow death. Doctors learn to accept that as part of life. Although we consider death to be our enemy, it’s something we know very well, and that we deal with all the time, and we know that we are no different. My body is just another body.”
Correction: June 23, 2014
An earlier version of this obituary misstated where Dr. Relman and his wife, Dr. Marcia Angell, met. They met when she was a student and he was a professor at Boston University School of Medicine, not Harvard Medical School. Because of an editing error, the earlier version also misstated the dates of Dr. Relman’s tenure as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. He held the post from 1977 to 1991, not from 1977 to 2000. (Dr. Angell was editor in 1999 and 2000.)

DEATH NOTICE

Dr. Eugene J. Ratner, born April  5, 1925, died on Tuesday June 24,  2014.  Dr. Ratner is survived by his loving wife of many years, Cecelia B. Ratner, and daughters Merle Ratner of Manhattan and Susan Ratner. Riverside Funeral Home ((212)-362-6600) is handling arrangements.

Monday, June 23, 2014

NYC OTB sets the pace with

life insurance on  all of its employees. All are now dead as the company went bankrupt?


An Employee Dies, and the Company Collects the Insurance

Freedom Communications’ chief executive, Aaron Kushner, defends the use of life insurance.Monica Almeida/The New York TimesFreedom Communications’ chief executive, Aaron Kushner, defends the use of life insurance.
Employees at The Orange County Register received an unsettling email from corporate headquarters this year. The owner of the newspaper, Freedom Communications, was writing to request workers’ consent to take out life insurance policies on them.
But the beneficiary of each policy would not be the survivors or estate of the insured employee, but the Freedom Communications pension plan. Reporters and editors resisted, uncomfortable with the notion that the company might profit from their deaths.
After an intensive lobbying campaign by Freedom Communications management, a modified plan was ultimately put in place. Yet Register employees were left shaken.
The episode at The Register reflects a common but little-known practice in corporate America: Companies are taking out life insurance policies on their employees, and collecting the benefits when they die.
Because so-called company-owned life insurance offers employers generous tax breaks, the market is enormous; hundreds of corporations have taken out policies on thousands of employees. Banks are especially fond of the practice. JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo hold billions of dollars of life insurance on their books, and count it as a measure of their ability to withstand financial shocks.
But critics say it is immoral for companies to profit from the death of employees, while employees themselves do not directly benefit. And despite a law enacted in 2006 that sought to curb the practice — companies now are restricted to insuring only the highest-paid 35 percent of employees, who must give their consent — it remains a growing, opaque and legal source of corporate profit.
“Companies are holding this humongous amount of coverage on the lives of human beings,” said Michael D. Myers, a lawyer in Houston who has brought class-action lawsuits against several companies with such policies.
Companies and banks say earnings from the insurance policies are used to cover long-term health care, deferred compensation and pension obligations.
“Life insurance is one of the ways of strengthening the long-term health of the pension plan and ensuring its ability to pay benefits,” Freedom Communications’ chief executive, Aaron Kushner, said in an interview.
And because such life insurance policies receive generous tax breaks — the company-paid premiums are tax-free, as are any investment returns on the policies and the death benefits eventually received — they are ideal investment vehicles for companies looking to set aside money to pay for pension plans. Companies argue that if they had to finance such obligations with investments taxed at a normal rate, they would incur losses and would not be able to offer the benefits to employees.
But in many cases, companies and banks can use the tax-free gains for whatever they choose. “If you want to take that money and go build a new bank branch, fine,” said Joseph E. Yesutis, a partner at the law firm Alston & Bird who specializes in banking regulation. “Companies don’t promise regulators they will use it for any specific purpose.”
Hundreds of billions of dollars of such policies are in place, providing companies with a steady stream of income as current and former employees die, even decades after they have retired or left the company.
Aon Hewitt estimates that in new policies worth at least $1 billion are being put in place annually, and that about one-third of the 1,000 largest companies in the country have such policies. Industry analysts estimate that as much as 20 percent of all new life insurance is taken out by companies on their employees.
But determining the exact size of the market for corporate- and bank-owned life insurance is impossible. With the exception of banks, companies do not have to report their insurance holdings.
“There is no reliable reporting of the use of who’s buying life insurance, of what they’re buying it for,” said Steven N. Weisbart, chief economist of the Insurance Information Institute.
Banks have to report their holdings because regulators want to know how much cash they could access if they had to redeem the policies in a pinch before the death of the insured employee.
That figure, known as the “cash surrender value” — or the amount they could withdraw immediately — provides a glimpse of just how big such policies can be.
Bank of America’s policies have a cash surrender value of at least $17.6 billion. If Wells Fargo had to redeem its policies tomorrow, it would reap at least $12.7 billion. JPMorgan Chase would collect at least $5 billion, according to filings with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.
Because banks could collect the cash from insurance companies quickly, if needed, life insurance holdings are considered Tier 1 Capital, a basic measure of a bank’s strength. Many banks have 10 to 25 percent of their Tier 1 Capital invested in life insurance policies, according to Goldstein Financial Group, a broker dealer.
Insurance industry experts say that most big banks have delayed new life insurance purchases, in part because of limits on how much insurance they can hold. Yet the value of existing policies continues to grow, with the gains from invested capital outpacing the benefits paid out as employees die.
Corporate- and bank-owned life insurance grew out of so-called key person insurance policies that protected companies against the economic consequences related to the death of top executives. The New York Times Company has taken out life insurance policies on some top employees.
But absent meaningful regulation around the practice, it grew unchecked, and soon companies were taking out policies on many poorly paid employees like janitors, then reaping millions in profit when they died.
A string of class-action lawsuits, some filed by Mr. Myers, went after companies abusing the practice. Several companies, including Walmart, settled the suits, paying millions to low-ranking employees who had been covered. The I.R.S. took companies including Winn-Dixie and Camelot Music to court for using policies as tax avoidance schemes.
Critics began calling the policies “dead peasant” insurance, an allusion to Nikolai Gogol’s novel “Dead Souls,” in which a con man buys up dead serfs to use them as collateral in a business deal.
Despite the criticism, companies and banks continued to use the policies to chase returns. In the years before the financial crisis, life insurers for banks including Wachovia and Fifth Third Bancorp invested their premiums in a hedge fund run by Citigroup.
As the value of the fund rose, the profits were recorded on the companies’ balance sheets, raising earnings. But when the hedge fund collapsed during the market panic, so did the value of the policies, leading the banks to take substantial write-downs.
Efforts have been made to better regulate the practice. The 2006 Pension Protection Act included a set of best practices for companies taking out life insurance on employees.
“The government has taken great strides to clean it up,” said J. Todd Chambley, who runs the executive benefits practice at Aon Hewitt.
Still, the notion of life insurance policies benefiting company balance sheets, rather than individuals, remains subject to criticism.
Responding to attacks on the Freedom Communications plan, Mr. Kushner defended himself in a letter to employees. “Life insurance is not ghoulish, nor are the people who sell it, nor are those who buy it,” he wrote. “Life insurance, by its very nature, was created to benefit the people we love and care about most.”

Mark Friedlander makes

Stipulations that he So Ordered VANISH and there is little you, the public can do about it?
Cecelia B. Ratner, wife of Dr. Eugene J Ratner was added to the case as an intervenor by STIPULUATION, but you would not know this unless you were in court when it happened, looked at the Court File (if you could find it) and /or received an illegible and/or barely legible copy from one of the parties.  Justice is blind and Stipulations are INVISIBLE? SEE BELOW.


 

WebCivil Supreme - Motion Detail
Court:     Bronx Civil Supreme
Index Number:     260334/2014
Case Name:     RATNER,EUGENE vs. ABRAMS,LAURENCE
Case Type:     Other (None Of The Above)
Track:     Standard
Motion Information:
Motion
Number
Date
Filed
Filed
By
Relief Sought Submit
Date
Answer
Demanded
Status Decision Order
Signed Date
001  04/25/2014  PLAINT  Miscellaneous    No  Open:

Before Justice: FRIEDLANDER 
   





WebCivil Supreme - Appearance Detail
Court: Bronx Civil Supreme
Index Number:   260334/2014
Case Name: RATNER,EUGENE vs. ABRAMS,LAURENCE
Case Type: Other (None Of The Above)
Track: Standard

Appearance Information:
Appearance
Date
Time On For Appearance
Outcome
Justice /
Part
Comments Motion
Seq
08/04/2014  Motion MARK FRIEDLANDER
TT 25 MOTION 
CNTL.DT
 
001
06/09/2014  Motion Adjourned  MARK FRIEDLANDER
TT 25 MOTION 
CNTL.DT
 
001
06/02/2014  Motion Adjourned  MARK FRIEDLANDER
TT 25 MOTION 

 
001
05/12/2014  Motion Adjourned  MARK FRIEDLANDER
TT 25 MOTION 

 
001






WebCivil Supreme - Case Detail
Court:Bronx Civil Supreme
Index Number:260334/2014
Case Name:RATNER,EUGENE vs. ABRAMS,LAURENCE
Case Type:Other (None Of The Above)
Track:Standard
RJI Filed: 04/25/2014
Date NOI Due:
NOI Filed:
Disposition Date:
Calendar Number:
Jury Status:
Justice Name: MARK FRIEDLANDER

Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
ELIOT L. KAPLAN  Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record  Atty. Status: Active
175 MAIN ST
WHITE PLAINS,NY 10601
(914) 682-0371

Attorney/Firm For Defendant:
- Prose    Attorney Type: Pro se    Atty. Status: Active


Sunday, June 22, 2014

Golden Girls or

Golden Mommy, Cecelia B Ratner

14 Canadian Silver Commemorative Coins

27 Krugerands 

15 Maple Leaves

14 Canadian Silver  Oliver Commemorative Coins

10 Maple Leaves

Merle Ratner (et al.) and Susan Ratner  (et al.) owe BOTH of their parents an accounting of the above objects previously located in their parents' apartment and whether said objects were sold or otherwise disposes of for the BENEFIT OF THEIR PARENTS.

G Ristori travels to the

Vatican to educate the Pope on useful alternatives and/or additions to marijuana to treat Multiple Sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases (see faustmanlab.org and pubmed.org faustman dl). The Pope, after careful review, calls Catholic Governor Andrew Cuomo and the Catholic Healthcare System in New York, a Christian State, in a Christian Country, and commends to their immediate attention the work of Ristori G and that Boston Redsox Fan  Denise L Faustman.  Italy upon the direction of the Vatican immediately starts to make BCG available to those that suffer from autoimmune diseases in the hope that they will then need to smoke less dope for medicinal purposes. It is clear that dope like alcohol will continue to be with us for many more years to come.  The Italian Parliament decides to upstage Obamacare by  conferring Italian citizenry uipon Denise L Faustman and seeing that her work and the peptides for curing autoimmune diseases are produced in Italy and sold reasonably all over the world.  Italy becomes solvent from recognizing that smoking dope is fun and sometimes useful for medicinal purposes until a better alternative like BCG comes along. Andrew Cuomo is a dope and needs to smoke more dope. The work of Ristori and Faustman et al show why New York State will NOT produce the next President of the United States. Smoke Dope and/or shoot BCG.







Neurology. 2014 Jan 7;82(1):41-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000438216.93319.ab. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Effects of Bacille Calmette-Guerin after the first demyelinating event in the CNS.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) effects after clinically isolated syndromes (CIS).

METHODS:

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants were randomly assigned to receive BCG or placebo and monitored monthly with brain MRI (6 scans). Both groups then entered a preplanned phase with IM interferon-β-1a for 12 months. From month 18 onward, the patients took the disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that their neurologist considered indicated in an open-label extension phase lasting up to 60 months.

RESULTS:

Of 82 randomized subjects, 73 completed the study (33 vaccinated and 40 placebo). During the initial 6 months, the number of cumulative lesions was significantly lower in vaccinated people. The relative risks were 0.541 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.308-0.956; p = 0.03) for gadolinium-enhancing lesions (the primary endpoint), 0.364 (95% CI 0.207-0.639; p = 0.001) for new and enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions, and 0.149 (95% CI 0.046-0.416; p = 0.001) for new T1-hypointense lesions. The number of total T1-hypointense lesions was lower in the BCG group at months 6, 12, and 18: mean changes from baseline were -0.09 ± 0.72 vs 0.75 ± 1.81 (p = 0.01), 0.0 ± 0.83 vs 0.88 ± 2.21 (p = 0.08), and -0.21 ± 1.03 vs 1.00 ± 2.49 (p = 0.02). After 60 months, the cumulative probability of clinically definite multiple sclerosis was lower in the BCG + DMT arm (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.99; p < 0.05), and more vaccinated people remained DMT-free (odds ratio = 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.93; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS:

Early BCG may benefit CIS and affect its long-term course.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:

BCG, as compared to placebo, was associated with significantly reduced development of gadolinium-enhancing lesions in people with CIS for a 6-month period before starting immunomodulating therapy (Class I evidence).
PMID:
24306002
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PMCID:
PMC3873620
[Available on 2015/1/7]
Write to the Help Desk

Pope Francis Condemns Legalization of Marijuana


Pope Francis attends the Corpus Christi Solemnity at Saint John Lateran Square on June 19, 2014 in Rome.
Pope Francis attends the Corpus Christi Solemnity at Saint John Lateran Square on June 19, 2014 in Rome. Franco Origlia—Getty Images
(VATICAN CITY) — Pope Francis has come out strongly against the legalization of recreational drugs, lending his voice to the debate which is raging from the U.S. to Uruguay and beyond.
Francis told members of a drug-enforcement conference meeting in Rome on Friday that even limited attempts to legalize recreational drugs “are not only highly questionable from a legislative standpoint, but they fail to produce the desired effects.”
Francis has frequently railed against the “evil” of drug addiction and has met with addicts on several occasions.
Just last month, Uruguay — next door to Francis’ native Argentina — approved selling marijuana cigarettes in pharmacies, and recreational marijuana is legal in the U.S. states of Colorado and Washington.



From the Office of The Governor
Dear Fellow New Yorker,
As the Legislative session concludes in Albany, we wrap up a very productive week where we accomplished several of our top priorities that will truly make New York a better state.
This week, we reached an agreement with legislative leaders on an effective package of bills to combat the state’s growing heroin, opioid and prescription drug abuse epidemic. Heroin abuse is a public health crisis in the state of New York. By introducing tougher laws and new programs to protect all New Yorkers, we are taking an aggressive stance to fight the dangers of drug abuse and help save lives.
We also passed legislation to establish a comprehensive medical marijuana program for New York State. Medical marijuana has the capacity to do a lot of good for a lot of people who are in pain and suffering, and are in desperate need of a treatment that will provide some relief. At the same time, medical marijuana is a difficult issue because there are risks to public health and safety that have to be averted. This bill is the right balance, and I commend the members of the Legislature who worked so hard on this measure.
These measures build on progress from our fourth, on-time budget passed in March that has set our State on a course of fiscal stability—recognized by all three financial rating agencies. In fact, today Fitch raised New York State's credit rating to its highest level ever, and on Monday, Moody's upgraded our credit rating to its highest level since 1964. We also enacted property tax relief for New York’s homeowners and business tax cuts to create jobs; set a plan in place to transform our schools, which included universal full-day pre-kindergarten; and enacted a series of laws to fight corruption and increase transparency in government.
Read the 2014 End of Session Report to learn more about our accomplishments achieved over the last six months. Together, we can lay the foundation for continued success and a stronger, greater New York.
Sincerely,

Governor Andrew M. Cuomo



Friday, June 20, 2014

Dan Snyder commends

Andrew Cuomo for scalping Greeks and keeping them out of Nassau OTB despite NY Const. Art 1, Sec. 3

Go Redskins!

Are Indians more easily offended than Greeks? Where is Lenny Bruce when we need him?






HI-
Thanks for the help. The item’s below. I’d be happy to mail you a copy, if you give me a mailing address.

Claude Solnik
(631) 913-4244
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348 

Home > LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays

Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012


Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.




U.S. News

U.S. Patent Office Cancels Washington Redskins Trademarks

Federal Agency Rules Redskins Name Disparages Native Americans


Updated June 18, 2014 8:26 p.m. ET
The Redskins play the New York Giants in 2013. Getty Images
A federal agency withdrew trademark protection for the Washington Redskins because it said the nickname is an insult to Native Americans, threatening millions of dollars the team and the National Football League make from merchandise and sponsorships.
A three-judge panel at the Patent & Trademark Office ruled 2-1 that the name wasn't worthy of federal trademark protection. The decision could escalate the campaign against a brand that the NFL and team owner Daniel M. Snyder have vigorously defended against increasingly strident criticism.
Stripping away trademark protection could dent the sport's lucrative licensing business and could make it harder to defend against counterfeit products. The appeal of the decision, however, could delay any potential effect for years.
The Washington Redskins' trademark on its name has been cancelled for being "disparaging to Native Americans," but the team believes ithe name is here to stay. Zeughauser Group's Kent Zimmermann joins the News Hub with his analysis. Photo: Getty
At a minimum, it is likely to further inflame a debate over the name of one of the most venerable sports franchises in the country and one that has been part of the capital's fabric since the 1930s. Over the past year, politicians including President Barack Obama have weighed in on the matter, and several major media outlets have called on the team to abandon the nickname.

Photos: The Washington Redskins' Canceled Trademarks

Mr. Snyder says it is an expression of respect and admiration to Native Americans. Robert Raskopf, a trademark attorney for the team, said the Redskins will appeal Wednesday's decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, a part of the PTO.
"We've seen this story before," said Mr. Raskopf. "And just like last time, today's ruling will have no effect at all on the team's ownership of and right to use the Redskins name and logo."
The office made a similar ruling in regard to the Redskins in 1999 that was later thrown out on technical grounds.
The long-term impact of the decision won't be clear for months, if not years, while the case is being appealed, but some legal experts say the decision is still a worrisome one for the team.
"You wouldn't invest in a company without a federal trademark, and I don't think moving forward without one is tenable for the team," said Christine Haight Farley, a trademark expert and professor at American University Washington College of Law.
Joseph D. Lewis, a trademark attorney with Barnes & Thornburg LLP in Washington, D.C., said the trademark ruling could also encourage further challenges to teams with Indian-themed names or mascots.
The NFL could potentially force a name change, but NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell repeatedly has said that the name wasn't meant to be offensive. In January, Mr. Goodell said, "this is…a football team that's had that name for 80 years and has presented the name in a way that it has honored Native Americans."
The PTO, part of the Department of Commerce, issues patents and registers trademarks for inventors and businesses. Under federal law, the U.S. government may refuse to register a trademark that disparages a "substantial composite" of a group.
The judges on Wednesday cited dictionary definitions that labeled the word "often offensive." They also relied on a 21-year-old anti-Redskins resolution adopted by the National Congress of American Indians, a major organization of Native American tribes.
The trademark office has rejected a number of other trademarks on the basis that they were disparaging. It objected to an applicant who wanted to register "Khoran" as a trademark for wine. And it turned down an attempt by Heeb magazine, a publication marketed to young urban Jews, to register "Heeb."
Courts often recognize trademark rights even in the absence of federal registration. If the Redskins ultimately lose the battle, however, the team would lose certain rights that attach to federal registrations, which could potentially make it harder for them to crack down on bootleg merchants.
The team could lose "tens of millions" on the royalties off merchandise, said Frank Vuono, formerly the NFL's vice president of retail licensing, if it ultimately lost its trademark. He also said the potential lost sponsorship royalties leaguewide could be in the "hundreds of millions."
"If I'm a bank or I'm an auto company and I want to promote using the Redskins, technically I could without paying anything," said Mr. Vuono, now a founder of 16W Marketing.
According to sponsorship consulting company IEG, the league's 32 teams pulled in a total of $1.07 billion in sponsorship revenue in 2013.
Native Americans protest over the Washington Redskins' nickname before the team's game against the Minnesota Vikings on Nov. 7, 2013 in Minneapolis. Adam Bettcher/Getty Images
David Carter, executive director of the University of Southern California's Sports Business Institute, said that among NFL revenue generators, merchandise sales ranks behind television revenue, sponsorships and ticket sales, and that money is split evenly between teams, meaning a potential revenue drop caused by bootleg merchandise would likely be small.
A new logo or trademark could in fact be a boon for the team. "There's an upside, depending on how they handle the process," Mr. Carter said, noting the Los Angeles Clippers have already rebounded from a scandal that ousted their owner, Donald Sterling, over racist comments earlier this spring.
Other professional sports teams have managed to quietly play down some of the more notable Native American references.
Baseball's Cleveland Indians, who said on Wednesday they currently face no legal complaints over their name, have still reduced the role of their "Chief Wahoo" logo in recent years, replacing the cartoon rendering on some editions of their hats and jerseys with a "C" logo. Other teams, notably football's Kansas City Chiefs and baseball's Atlanta Braves have scrapped mascots, while retaining some Native American symbols.
The issue is more complicated at the college level. Stanford, St. John's and Eastern Michigan universities changed their Native American nicknames long before 2005, when the NCAA began threatening schools with sanctions if they kept "hostile and abusive" nicknames. A few, like the Central Michigan Chippewas and Florida State Seminoles were able to keep the names, after getting approval from local tribes.
The effort to cancel the Redskins trademarks began in 1992—months after the team won their last Super Bowl—when a group of Native Americans led by activist Suzan Harjo filed a petition with the trademark office.
The idea came from a young lawyer at Dorsey & Whitney LLP in Minneapolis named Stephen Baird, who approached the firm with the idea around the time of the championship game, which was held in Minneapolis and featured a matchup between the Redskins and the Buffalo Bills, according to lawyers familiar with the case.
In 1999, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled that the name was disparaging and should be changed. But a U.S. district judge in 2003 found that the trademark office hadn't explained why the Redskins trademark was disparaging.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2009 also sided with the Redskins, but for a technical reason. It found that the challengers should have brought their complaint years earlier if they were offended by the name. The board on Wednesday said that wasn't an issue for the new group of challengers, who brought the complaint soon after they reached the legal age of 18. The plaintiffs argued that a new generation of Native Americans could renew the case.
The current petitioners are five Native Americans from different tribes who said they were offended by the team's name.
In his dissent, Judge Marc Bergsman said the petitioners still failed to prove that the term "redskins" was disparaging at the time the trademarks were registered.
But Jesse Witten, a lawyer for a group of Native Americans who challenged the trademark, said on Wednesday that the "agency made a mistake in the past when it granted registration." He added: "These trademarks are now more difficult to protect."
Write to Jacob Gershman at jacob.gershman@wsj.com, Ashby Jones at ashby.jones@wsj.com and Kevin Clark at kevin.clark@wsj.com

The Trial of Lenny Bruce - UMKC School of Law

law.umkc.edu/.../bruc...
University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law
An account of the 1964 Cafe Au Go Go trial of comedian Lenny Bruce in New ... successfully nine free speech cases before the United States Supreme Court.

Lenny Bruce - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenny_Bruce
Wikipedia
Lenny Bruce was born Leonard Alfred Schneider in Mineola, New York, grew up in .... These performances often included rants about his court battles over ...

MEDIA FACT SHEET Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ...

www.uspto.gov/.../USPTO_Of...
United States Patent and Trademark Office
2 days ago - Pro Football, Inc. decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ... law, the federal registrations for the “Redskins” trademarks involved in ...

WSJ reporters spotted at

Nassau OTB, a public benefit corporation, looking for signs of life, beer, Carle Place restaurant, and slot machines before heading to Suffolk on the way to Ditch Plains and points east?

U.S. News

Casino Boom Pinches Northeastern States

Influx of Competition Leaves Early Players—Such as Delaware, New Jersey and West Virginia—Struggling to Keep Bets Flowing



    June 19, 2014 7:27 p.m. ET
    Racetrack casinos used to contribute as much as $240 million a year to Delaware's tax coffers. But as the Northeast becomes saturated with gambling venues, the state's casino revenue has tumbled, prompting a new industry request—for a tax break.
    "It's a different world for the Delaware casinos," said Democratic Gov. Jack Markell, who supports reducing the tax burden on casinos by $20 million a year to help them compete.
    More casinos have opened in the Northeast over the past decade than in any other part of the country, and the expansion is causing upheaval in the region. States that adopted gambling earlier than their neighbors, such as Delaware, New Jersey and West Virginia, are watching dollars drain away, and new projects have some wondering how many facilities the area can support.
    Twenty-six casinos have opened since 2004, fueling a 39% increase in total annual gambling revenue in the mid-Atlantic and New England, according to a study by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Within 100 miles of Philadelphia, there now are 24 casinos, a big shift from the early 1990s, when Atlantic City, N.J., enjoyed an East Coast monopoly. At least a dozen more gambling spots are in the pipeline from Massachusetts to Maryland, raising fears in states such as Rhode Island that their casino tax windfall is at risk.
    The casino-building boom is "a declaration of war—indirect war—by the states," said the Rev. Richard McGowan, a casino expert and Boston College adjunct associate professor. "What they're saying is, 'I want the revenue. I want the revenue back.' "
    A recent Fitch Ratings report said the Northeastern market "is reaching a saturation point." Analysts say similar market shakeouts are occurring in Indiana and Mississippi on smaller scales.
    Even Pennsylvania, which has roared out of nowhere since 2006 to become the state with the second-most gambling revenue, after Nevada, has seen its fortunes wane, in part because of competition from Maryland and Ohio. Slots revenues at Pennsylvania's 12 casinos are down more than 4% in the first 11 months of the fiscal year ending in June, after dropping last year as well, according to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board.
    Harrah's racetrack casino opened in Chester, Pa., in 2007 and pays the city millions every year, accounting for roughly one of five dollars in the municipal budget. But the arrival of two more area casinos slashed Harrah's slot-machine revenue by nearly 30%, state figures show, reducing the city's share. The introduction of Las Vegas-style table games in 2010 has helped offset the decline, and this year the casino began paying property taxes after a seven-year exemption expired. Still, city officials are concerned.
    "Any loss of dollars is seriously missed here," said Mayor John Linder.
    Some public services have been affected. Ocean County, N.J., no longer offers low-cost rides for new dialysis patients because of a dip in casino revenues that fund programs for the elderly and disabled.
    Delaware officials say declining gambling money—down 29% since fiscal 2011—is one reason the state cut 538 public jobs over the past five years.
    Delaware's once-profitable Dover Downs DDE +3.60% casino netted just $13,000 last year and lost $1 million the first quarter this year, said Chief Executive Denis McGlynn. He blamed competition, coupled with a 17% increase in the tax rate on slots in 2009, for an "unworkable business model."
    Delaware's proposed tax relief for casinos, which needs legislative approval, would lower the table-game tax rate, eliminate fees and shift vendor costs to the state.
    New Jersey takes 9.25% of casino revenue, less than nearby states. Nevertheless, Atlantic City's 11 casinos collectively have suffered revenue declines since 2006. The recession, superstorm Sandy and competition from Pennsylvania all have contributed. On Thursday, the city's Revel resort and casino filed for Chapter 11 protection, its second trip to bankruptcy court in recent years.
    In January, Caesars Entertainment Corp. CZR -1.56% and a rival closed the bankrupt Atlantic Club Casino Hotel after buying it. Among the hundreds laid off was 62-year-old Pat Van Woeart, who had earned $35,000 a year serving food in the casino's coffee shop. "Now I'm losing my home," she said. "My unemployment is going to run out real soon. I've applied for every job in the world."
    Hoping to compensate for casino declines, New Jersey and Delaware have allowed their casinos to offer Internet gambling, with limited success. Pennsylvania officials are exploring the same.
    In southern New England, states are bracing for a hit when Massachusetts opens its casinos. The first, a Penn National Gaming Inc. PENN -1.89% slots parlor about 12 miles from Rhode Island's biggest casino, is expected to open next year.
    A 2011 Massachusetts law also allows three resort-style casinos, and a Native American casino may be in the works. A battle is continuing for a coveted license near Boston, the last big Northeastern city without a nearby casino.
    "It kind of was the last frontier of market without commercial gaming" in the region, said Mitchell Etess, chief executive of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, which is competing for rights to build a $1.3 billion casino near Boston's Logan Airport. Mohegan also has casinos in Connecticut and Pennsylvania and is vying for other regional licenses.
    Pennsylvania's Valley Forge Casino, above, before its 2012 opening, has taken business from a nearby one. Associated Press
    The Mohegan Sun Native American casino opened in Connecticut in 1996, and nearby Foxwoods Resort Casino opened four years earlier. They had little outside competition for years. But since the recession, the state's 25% cut of slot-machine revenue has been under pressure, said Thomas Fiore, fiscal and program policy director at Connecticut's Office of Policy and Management.
    Partly because of competition from racetrack casinos on the outskirts of New York City—and soon from Massachusetts—Connecticut has forecast a 5% decline in state revenue from casinos in fiscal 2016 and a 20% drop the following year, Mr. Fiore said.
    "There is dramatic oversupply in the industry right now," said Foxwoods Chief Executive Scott Butera.
    In neighboring Rhode Island, casino dollars accounted for 9.5% of state revenue last fiscal year, one of the highest levels in the country, and are the third-largest source of state revenue.
    The state has two casinos: a small one in Newport that developers hope to remake as a Monte Carlo-styled boutique casino if voters approve table games in a November referendum, and the far larger Twin River Casino outside Providence, which last year added voter-approved table games including blackjack.
    Since the state approved video-gambling machines in 1992, its reliance on casino dollars has grown. Now Rhode Island is projecting it will lose about $422 million in casino revenue over the next five years, contributing to budget struggles.
    "We did kind of continue to pursue that easy money," said Thomas Mullaney, Rhode Island's budget officer.
    In Chester, Pa., city officials have plans to renovate downtown buildings and open a pasta factory in a long-abandoned plant. Still, with nearly 1,700 casino jobs on the line, the wager on gambling continues.
    "We are hoping that something changes so they can continue to make money—and we can continue to make money," the mayor said.
    Write to Jon Kamp at jon.kamp@wsj.com