come to rome and beat the hell out of the one who runs or attempts to run the truck over the ehite woman
https://us2ndcircuitcourtofappealsopinions.justia.com/2018/01/03/wandering-dago-inc-v-destito/
ny pml sec 109 does not apply to nassau otb and or violates the rights of bettors secured by ny const art 1 sec 3
Thanks for the help. The item’s below. I’d be happy to mail you a copy, if you give me a mailing address.
Claude Solnik
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348
Home > LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays
Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012
Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.
Monday, April 15, 2019
Sunday, April 21, 2019
| Track Code | Track Name | Entry | Scratch | 1st Post ET | 1st Post Local | Time Zone | Stakes Race(s) | Stakes Grade | T.V. Indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GOLDEN GATE FIELDS | 48 | 24 | 3:45 PM | 12:45 PM | PDT | |||
| LS | LONE STAR PARK | 72 | 0 | 3:35 PM | 2:35 PM | CDT | |||
| SA | SANTA ANITA PARK | 72 | 24 | 3:30 PM | 12:30 PM | PDT | |||
| SUN | SUNLAND PARK | 168 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 12:30 PM | MDT | |||
| WO | WOODBINE | 72 | 48 |
POSTED APRIL 23, 2019, 12:17 PM CDT
Parking enforcement officers in Saginaw, Michigan, who use chalk to mark the tires of cars to track how long they have been parked are violating the constitution, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.
A three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at Cincinnati held that the practice of chalking violated plaintiff Alison Taylor’s right under the Fourth Amendment to be free from unreasonable searches. The Washington Post, the Associated Press and NBC News have coverage.
Taylor sued the city of Saginaw and its parking enforcement officer Tabitha Hoskins in 2017 after receiving 15 parking tickets in three years. She claimed that the city put chalk on her tires without her consent or a valid search warrant.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted the city of Saginaw’s motion to dismiss the case, finding that even though chalking might have constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment, that search was reasonable under the community caretaker exception.
“Because we chalk this practice up to a regulatory exercise, rather than a community-caretaking function, we reverse,” Judge Bernice Bouie Donald wrote in the panel’s decision.
The city of Saginaw was not acting in its role as a community caretaker, as the purpose of chalking was to raise revenue, not protect the public against a safety risk, Donald said.
“The city does not demonstrate, in law or logic, that the need to deter drivers from exceeding the time permitted for parking—before they have even done so—is sufficient to justify a warrantless search under the community caretaker rationale,” she said.
The decision sets a new standard for Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee, which are covered by the 6th Circuit, the Associated Press says.
The ruling on Monday remanded the case back to the district court.
No comments:
Post a Comment