on sunday april 1 2018 nassau otb was closed when gulfstream park, santa snita, suland and golden gate were running for us to bet. the pope can tell the faithful when easter sunday falls but andrew cuomo cannot.
Claude Solnik
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348
Home > LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays
Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012
Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.
Colorado Baker Sues Governor Over Cake Dispute With Transgender Woman
DENVER — The baker who won a United States Supreme Court case this year after refusing to make a cake for a same-sex wedding has sued the governor of Colorado, alleging the state discriminated against him when he declined to make a blue and pink cake for a transgender woman.
The lawsuit sets up yet another public battle involving Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop over whether claims of religious freedoms can be used to refuse services to gay and transgender people. The Supreme Court did not definitively decide on that question in its ruling earlier this year, ensuring additional legal fights.
This time, the suit involves a customer, Autumn Scardina, who asked Mr. Phillips to make a cake with a blue exterior and pink interior that would mark her birthday and the seventh anniversary of her gender transition.
Mr. Phillips refused because the celebration ran contrary to his belief that gender is “given by God,” his lawyers said, and “not determined by perceptions or feelings.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The suit, filed in Federal District Court in Denver this week, alleges that Colorado officials are on a “crusade” against Mr. Phillips because he refuses to make cakes that violate his religious beliefs. In recent years, his lawyers say, he has been targeted by potential customers eager to test the limit of the law.
On the same day in June 2017 that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the first case, the lawsuit says Ms. Scardina, a lawyer, called Masterpiece Cakeshop and requested the gender transition cake. Then, days after the Supreme Court ruling, the state’s civil rights division issued a decision finding probable cause that state law requires Mr. Phillips to make the new cake.
Mr. Phillips alleges that the state’s decision violates his First Amendment rights to freely exercise his religious beliefs.
“The woman on the phone did not object to my request for a birthday cake until I told her I was celebrating my transition,” Ms. Scardina wrote in a complaint to the state, explaining her interaction with one of Mr. Phillips’s employees. “I was stunned.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Mr. Phillips’s small bakery, with its cafe tables and glass case of cookies, is tucked into a shopping center in the Denver suburb of Lakewood. It became part of a national discussion over religious rights after Mr. Phillips received a 2012 visit from David Mullins and Charlie Craig, gay men looking for a wedding cake for a reception in Colorado.
Mr. Phillips declined, and the couple filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, saying that Mr. Phillips had violated a state law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation. Mr. Mullins and Mr. Craig won before the state commission and in the state courts.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Mr. Phillips’s favor, but in doing so passed on the opportunity to rule on whether a business can refuse service to gay or transgender people by invoking First Amendment rights. Instead, in the majority opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy argued that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission had been shown to be hostile to religion in that particular case.
“The outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts,” he wrote.
Disputes concerning businesses that sell wedding services, including florists, calligraphers, photographers and videographers, are being litigated around the nation. Earlier this month, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg predicted that the question of whether there can be religious exemptions to anti-discrimination laws might soon return to the Supreme Court.
In an interview with Colorado Public Radio this week, Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, said that he supports religious freedom but does not believe Americans should be able to use it to deny service. “I don’t think there should be bias involved of who you chose to serve and who you don’t,” he said.
But Mr. Phillips’s lawyers, who are affiliated with the conservative Christian organization Alliance Defending Freedom, allege that the state of Colorado “is ignoring the message of the U.S. Supreme Court.”
“Jack shouldn’t have to fear government hostility when he opens his shop for business each day,” they said in a statement. “We’re asking the court to put a stop to that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment