Monday, July 30, 2018

the white girl does not even know that ny does not

decide when easter sunday snd that ny kills cripples and maims by failing to see thst bcg is avsilable to all in need
see faustmanlab.org pubmed.org ristori + bcg


sarin can be cooked up in the kitchen you cannot regulate character by passing laws to try to vhoke off knowledge


remember ehen the atom bomb plsns were on the shrlf in the public library out west?




NY to join 7 others states, D.C. in 

Claude Solnik
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348 

Home > LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays

Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012



Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.

shoot ny pml sec 109 with a lawsuit clai




lawsuit to prevent 3D gun printing

FILE - This May 10, 2013, file photo shows a plastic pistol that was completely made on a 3D-printer at a home in Austin, Texas. A coalition of gun-control groups has filed an appeal in federal court seeking to block a recent Trump administration ruling that will allow the publication of blueprints to build a 3D-printed firearm. (Jay Janner/Austin American-Statesman via AP, File)
NEW YORK (WHAM/AP) - New York will join seven other states and the District of Columbia in filing a federal lawsuit to prevent 3D guns from being printed.
New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood announced Monday that she will file suit to prevent materials used in the creation of guns through 3D printers from being distributed.
“It is, simply, crazy to give criminals the tools to build untraceable, undetectable 3-D printed guns at the touch of a button. Yet that's exactly what the Trump administration is allowing,” said Attorney General Underwood. “We won't stand by as New Yorkers’ safety is jeopardized by this abrupt about-face by the federal government.”
A coalition of Attorneys General in Washington, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Maryland, and the District of Columbia will be part of the lawsuit
In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a lawsuit filed by the company that created the instructions for a 3D gun, which reverted to a lower court ruling that the manuals violate firearm export laws.

The company, Defense Distributed, recently announced that it would upload the data files to the Internet after a reversal by the federal government.
The lawsuit alleges that this decision violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Tenth Amendment and requests a nationwide temporary restraining order.
Rochester Police Chief Michael Ciminelli said it’s something the nation needs to get a handle on.
“Obviously people have different views of the whole firearm issue, but it is regulated," Ciminelli said Monday. "And I think in the state of New York, there are protections in place. And if someone can literally just produce a gun, that’s certainly a safety issue for officers and for the community at large. So it’s something I hope the state and federal government take a closer look at.”
Defense Distributed filed its own suit in Texas on Sunday, asserting that it's the victim of an "ideologically-fueled program of intimidation and harassment" that violates its First Amendment rights.

No comments:

Post a Comment