feds coming knovking
nassau otb employees have been scammed and worse by al et al who purport to be consultants
newsday whitewashes and fails to report on what has become of her civil rico lawsuit
needless to say the game that vivtimizes nassau vounty residents
bet the next ambassador pool, country, etc. the pardon is written and simply awaits mailing
Al D'Amato, Katuria D'Amato settle matrimonial battle, spokesman says
Former U.S. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato and his estranged wife, Katuria D'Amato, leave Nassau County Supreme Court Matrimonial Center in Mineola on Jan. 3, 2019. Credit: Composite: Newsday / J. Conrad Williams Jr.
Former U.S. Sen. Alfonse D’Amato and Katuria D’Amato have settled their matrimonial battle and will raise their two children “cooperatively,” a spokesman for both said Thursday.
The statement didn’t specify if the couple, who married in 2004, had finalized divorce proceedings. It said only that the couple had reached “an amicable settlement as it relates to their current matrimonial matter.”
“The two parties will not comment further except to say that they are both pleased that this matter has been resolved in the best interests of all concerned,” added the statement, released by public relations representative Gary Lewi.
The settlement follows a highly-publicized fight between the couple over temporary custody of their son, now 11, and daughter, now 10, that ended last year.
In June, a judge awarded the former senator, 82, temporary custody of the couple’s children. But State Supreme Court Justice Joseph Lorintz also ruled at that time that Katuria D’Amato, 54, no longer needed supervision while parenting.
Katuria D'Amato, an attorney who represented herself after Lorintz disqualified her third lawyer in the case, said at the time of the ruling that the idea she needed
to be supervised with her children "was preposterous from the outset."
to be supervised with her children "was preposterous from the outset."
Lorintz's decision followed a custody hearing that stretched for more than a year after Katuria D'Amato's 911 call in September 2017 from the couple's former Lido Beach marital home led to her involuntary hospitalization.
Days later, the judge granted Alfonse D'Amato custody of the children after the former senator questioned his estranged wife's mental stability following the 911 call about a possible home intrusion.
Access additional case information on PACER
D'Amato v. D'Amato et al
| Katuria D'Amato |
| James Lorenzen, David Smith, Mark Green, Esq., Catherine Cash, Saul Roth, Park Strategies, LLC, Nassau County Police Commissioner, Patrick Ryder, International Investigation Group, Ltd, Gassman, Baiamonte, Gruner, P.C., James Cash, David Mack, Daniel Ribacoff, Hon. Madeline Singas, Lisa Ribacoff, Stanley Redy, M.D., Richard Murphy, Jason Hernandez, The County of Suffolk, Hon. Joseph H. Lorintz, Joshua Gruner, Esq., Stephen Gassman, Esq., Jimmy Lee, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Namdi Odiah, M.D., Frances Bein, Vincent Adamo, Schlissel, Ostrow & Karabatos, PLLC, Alfonse D'Amato, The Nassau County Police Department, Joshua Kuglar, M.D. and The County of Nassau |
| 2:2019cv01398 |
| March 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28:1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Katuria D'Amato (Liotti, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Proposed summons is rejected; the form that is on the Court's website is to be utilized; Counsel is advised to submit another proposed summons using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. Defendants were added to the case incorrectly; docket entry 1 was deleted and re-entered against corrected defendants. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) . (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/12/2019: #1 Additional Corrections) (Rodin, Deanna). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. by Alfonso D'Amato, Katuria D'Amato, Luciana D'Amato (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Liotti, Thomas) |
| NOTICE : The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet and Proposed Summons. Counsel is directed to forward a completed (2 Page Form)Civil Cover Sheet, answering all questions including the NY-E Division of Business Rule 50.1(d)(2) section on the second page. Please use the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| FILING FEE: $400, receipt number ANYEDC-11275443 (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No, filed by Katuria D'Amato. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Rodin, Deanna) Modified on 3/12/2019 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
No comments:
Post a Comment