A smart stripper knows that king Cuomo cannot close Nassau oTB on Sunday April 4 2021
Strippers start betting topless at 1063 Hempstead turnpike Franklin square in advance of Sunday April 4 2021 to send the message and remind Cuomo that the woman of the wandering dago food truck was only the first of many to come for the king
NYC strip clubs take Cuomo to court over COVID closures https://nypost.com/2021/03/18/nyc-strip-clubs-take-cuomo-to-court-over-covid-closures/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons via @nypmetro
See wandering dago us court of appeals second circuit decision
Help open Nassau itb for the faithful whether or not you listen to the slants
The Asian American Journalist Association called on Conde Nast to rescind her job offer. This week, the spa killings in Georgia — in which eight people murdered included six Asian women — kept the topic of anti-Asian violence at the top of the news cycle.
Goldman Sachs analysts ask for Asian woman
| Track Code | Track Name | Entryway | Scratch | 1st Post ET | 1st Post Local | Time Zone | Stakes Race(s) | Stakes Grade | T.V. Indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GOLDEN GATE FIELDS | 72 | 24 | 3:45 PM | 12:45 PM | PDT | |||
| HAW | HAWTHORNE | the 72 | 0 | 4:10 PM | 3:10 PM | CDT | |||
| LAD | LOUISIANA DOWNS (QH) | 168 | 0 | 2:00 PM | 1:00 PM | CDT | |||
| SA | SANTA Anita |
Wandering Dago, Inc. v. Destito, No. 16-622 (2d Cir. 2018)
WD filed suit against OGS, alleging that defendants violated its rights under the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, and the New York State Constitution by denying WD's applications to participate as a food truck vendor in the Lunch Program based on its ethnic-slur branding. The Second Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendant, holding that defendants' action violated WD's equal protection rights and its rights under the New York State Constitution. In this case, it was undisputed that defendants denied WD's applications solely because of its ethnic-slur branding. In Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017), the Supreme Court clarified that this action amounted to viewpoint discrimination and, if not government speech or otherwise protected, was prohibited by the First Amendment. The court rejected defendants' argument that their actions were unobjectionable because they were either part of OGS's government speech or permissible regulation of a government contractor's speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment