FRANCESCO CLEMENTI
 
                        FRANCESCO CLEMENTI
HealthFRANCESCO CLEMENTI is Associate Professor in the field 12E2 (IUS/21, Comparative Public Law) in the Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Perugia.He was researcher in Public Law at the same Faculty (2006-2007), and previously Research Fellow in Comparative Public Law in the Faculty of Law of the University La Sapienza, Rome (2004-2006), and PhD in “Theory of the State and comparative political Institutions” (Cycle XIV – 2003). In 1998, he won the annual Graduation prize by “Primo Levi Foundation”.
He is member of the Board of the Doctorate in Public Law (Università di Perugia) and professor of Italian and comparative constitutional law in the Master Program of the Institute for Defense Studies (I.A.S.D). He is component of the Working Group “Section Constitutional Law”, chaired by Prof. Jean Massot and Prof. Philippe Lauvaux, the “Societe’ de Legislation Comparee”.
Since 2011 he is lecturer at the School of Government of LUISS
FRANCESCO CLEMENTI
 
                        FRANCESCO CLEMENTI
HealthFRANCESCO CLEMENTI is Associate Professor in the field 12E2 (IUS/21, Comparative Public Law) in the Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Perugia.He was researcher in Public Law at the same Faculty (2006-2007), and previously Research Fellow in Comparative Public Law in the Faculty of Law of the University La Sapienza, Rome (2004-2006), and PhD in “Theory of the State and comparative political Institutions” (Cycle XIV – 2003). In 1998, he won the annual Graduation prize by “Primo Levi Foundation”.
He is member of the Board of the Doctorate in Public Law (Università di Perugia) and professor of Italian and comparative constitutional law in the Master Program of the Institute for Defense Studies (I.A.S.D). He is component of the Working Group “Section Constitutional Law”, chaired by Prof. Jean Massot and Prof. Philippe Lauvaux, the “Societe’ de Legislation Comparee”.
Since 2011 he is lecturer at the School of Government of LUISS
In Italy, Plans for an Easter Blessing Yield a Lawsuit for a Public School
TO LAWYER(S) IN ITALY. HELP IS ON THE WAY FOR BETTORS AND SOME OTB EMPLOYEES AND A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION THAT DOES NOT WANT TO END UP LIKE NYC OTB, BANKRUPT.
https://plus.google.com/106124193420148841642/posts
Europe|In Italy, Plans for an Easter Blessing Yield a Lawsuit for a Public School

BOLOGNA,
 Italy —  The 16 board members of Giosuè Carducci Elementary School took
 their seats, chatting amicably, until the agenda turned to Easter. The 
board had already agreed to let a Roman Catholic priest offer a blessing
 at their public school. Now the questions involved setting the date and
 whether to hold the prayer in the gym.
And the matter of the lawsuit.
“I
 am absolutely against this motion,” declared Monica Fontanelli, a board
 member, who accused the majority of trying to pre-empt the Thursday 
court hearing by setting the blessing for an earlier date. “It is wrong 
that this board is not waiting for the decision of the administrative 
court.”
Yet
 others quickly countered that most of the school’s students were 
Catholic, and that the rights of the majority mattered, too. “I support 
holding it in the garden so that even passers-by get a blessing!” 
offered one board member, jokingly.
No country in the world is more synonymous with Catholicism than Italy,
 where the overwhelming majority of the population is baptized as 
Catholics, and where the pope lives in a city-state surrounded by the 
heart of Rome.

In
 Bologna, like so many of Italy’s ancient cities, the history and 
landscape are intertwined with Catholicism. A statue of the city’s 
patron saint, Petronius, rises between the city’s two medieval towers. 
Catholic churches are scattered throughout a city center known for its 
elegant sidewalks shaded by porticoes.
Yet
 here, as elsewhere in Italy, Catholicism has long been in retreat. 
Attendance at Mass has fallen sharply over the decades as many Italians 
became either nonpracticing or nonbelievers.
The
 case over the blessing at the school is part of a continuing debate in 
Italy over where exactly the church-state boundary lies. A similar case 
arose at the same school years ago when the issue was whether a priest 
could offer an Easter prayer in a classroom during school hours. A local
 court prohibited the prayers.
This
 time, the prayers are voluntary and, while still held on school 
grounds, timed for shortly after the closing bell of classes. A group of
 parents and teachers filed a legal action, arguing that the prayers are
 unconstitutional.
Supporters
 of the voluntary prayers say they fall within the latitude that Italy 
allows for the church. Italy is a secular state but has a special treaty
 with the Vatican, which provides that public schools offer an hour of voluntary weekly religious instruction, coordinated by local dioceses.
“The
 majority of teachers and students in public schools are Catholics,” 
said the Rev. Vittorio Zoboli, one of the priests who made the requests 
to hold prayers. “So they are happy to have this.”
Even
 as church attendance declines, the influence of the church on politics 
and public life remains significant — and has been upheld in Italian and
 European courts.
In 2011, the European Court for Human Rights overturned its own earlier decision
 and ruled that state schools in Europe could hang crucifixes in 
classrooms, concluding that they were “an essentially passive symbol 
whose influence on pupils was not comparable to that of didactic speech 
or participation in religious activities.”
That second ruling came after an uproar in Italy when the crucifixes were initially banned.
The
 latest prayer controversy in Bologna emerged after priests began their 
Lenten ritual of canvassing their parishes, carrying supplies of 
consecrated water, in order to offer Easter blessings to shops, offices 
and individual homes.
“There are many people who have never been to church — but they are happy to have their houses blessed!” Father Zoboli said.
Yet
 a group of parents and teachers was not happy about blessing Giosuè 
Carducci Elementary and two other schools in the same district. Angela 
Giardino, a mother of a Carducci student, said she sent an email to all 
the parents of her child’s classmates, trying to stir a discussion, 
warning that the prayer infringed on the rights of non-Catholics and 
could violate the Constitution.
“No
 one answered me,” said Ms. Giardino, who added that she did not oppose 
religion or anyone’s right to practice it (or their right to receive a 
blessing) — only where it is conducted.
“Everything has a place, and the school is not the place for these blessings,” she said.
European countries delineate the church-state split in different ways. France is famous for its laïcité, a strict division that largely forbids religious expression in the public sphere.
“In
 Italy, it is different,” said Francesco Clementi, a constitutional law 
expert at Perugia University. “We do not have religion in the state, but
 we have tradition and relationships that link the Italian Republic with
 the Catholic Church.”
Many
 Italian schools have nativity scenes around Christmas or hold 
assemblies to sing Christmas songs. The argument is that these rituals 
are part of the cultural legacy of Italy, a point contested by staunch 
secularists.
“Is
 it fair that everyone has to see this, even if some students are 
Muslims, Buddhist or atheists?” asked Adele Orioli, legal adviser to 
Italy’s Union of Atheists and Rationalistic Agnostics.
The Rev. Raffaelle Buono, who oversees religious education in the Bologna schools, disagreed.
“What
 do you mean by this term ‘laity’?” he asked. “Two words: inclusive and 
exclusive. The French way of understanding laity is to exclude. You have
 to ban every religious symbol. In Italy, by tradition, we understand 
laity as inclusive. You have to put value on your ‘belongings,’ 
including your religious ‘belongings.’”
He added: “It is not a matter of faith. It is a matter of belonging to a tradition.”
In
 Bologna, the prayer controversy quickly rippled into local newspapers 
and stirred anger on social media against the complainants. Some said 
that liberals were willing to make special accommodations to Muslims but
 not Catholics. Others warned that stripping schools of Christian 
rituals would open society to an Islamic invasion.
The
 March 12 school board meeting at Carducci Elementary was also 
contentious. The board had selected March 20, 21 and 28 for prayers at 
Carducci and the two other schools in the district. With anger boiling 
over, the board voted for the dates.
“The
 debate was heated because there is a lot of hatred against anything 
that has to do with religion,” said Giovanni Prodi, 43, the board 
chairman, after the meeting. “I am a practicing Catholic. I think it is a
 good thing.”
The
 court hearing will be held Thursday, and Italy’s association of 
atheists and agnostics is also a party to the case. “We are defending 
the laity of the state and of public schools,” Ms. Orioli said.
No
 matter what the court decides, the decision’s impact will come. The 
prayers were held at all three district schools last Friday and 
Saturday. The prayer scheduled for this Saturday, two days after the 
court hearing, has been canceled.
Dear H.E. Most Reverend Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano:
I am an employee of Nassau OTB, a New York public benefit corporation, that closes on Roman Catholic Easter Sunday and Palm Sunday in preference to the same holy days observed by members of the Eastern Orthodox Church on different Sundays. NY Const Art 1, Sec 3 precludes the State of New York from such religious preference. I am not a Christian and believe that people should be able to freely choose their days of work, prayer and/or betting on horses at Nassau OTB, a public benefit corporation. The New York State Lottery is open every day of the year and the slot machines in NY are open every day of the year. I would like to be able to work on days that others may observe as days of prayer. I acknowledge that the US is a Christian nation and the only religious holiday on the US federal calendar is Christmas.
Would the Church express its opinion on this matter to its member Governor Andrew Cuomo who is my Governor and charged with seeing that the laws of the State of NY are "faithfully" executed?
My contact information is set forth below along with a background article. More background material is available upon request.
Sincerely yours,
Jackson Leeds
Nassau OTB Cashier
1528 Kenneth Avenue
Baldwin, NY 11510-1601
(516)223-8407 (home)
> LI Confidential > Stop scratching on holidays
Stop scratching on holidays
Published: June 1, 2012
Off Track Betting in New York State has been racing into a crisis called shrinking revenue. Some people have spitballed a solution: Don’t close on holidays.
New York State Racing Law bars racing on Christmas, Easter and Palm Sunday, and the state has ruled OTBs can’t handle action on those days, even though they could easily broadcast races from out of state.
“You should be able to bet whenever you want,” said Jackson Leeds, a Nassau OTB employee who makes an occasional bet. He added some irrefutable logic: “How is the business going to make money if you’re not open to take people’s bets?”
Elias Tsekerides, president of the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York, said OTB is open on Greek Orthodox Easter and Palm Sunday.
“I don’t want discrimination,” Tsekerides said. “They close for the Catholics, but open for the Greek Orthodox? It’s either open for all or not open.”
OTB officials have said they lose millions by closing on Palm Sunday alone, with tracks such as Gulfstream, Santa Anita, Turf Paradise and Hawthorne running.
One option: OTBs could just stay open and face the consequences. New York City OTB did just that back in 2003. The handle was about $1.5 million – and OTB was fined $5,000.
Easy money.
HI-
Thanks for the help. The item’s below. I’d be happy to mail you a copy, if you give me a mailing address.
Claude Solnik
(631) 913-4244
Long Island Business News
2150 Smithtown Ave.
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779-7348
FRANCESCO CLEMENTI
clementi
FRANCESCO CLEMENTI
Health
FRANCESCO CLEMENTI is Associate Professor in the field 12E2 (IUS/21, Comparative Public Law) in the Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Perugia.He was researcher in Public Law at the same Faculty (2006-2007), and previously Research Fellow in Comparative Public Law in the Faculty of Law of the University La Sapienza, Rome (2004-2006), and PhD in “Theory of the State and comparative political Institutions” (Cycle XIV – 2003).
In 1998, he won the annual Graduation prize by “Primo Levi Foundation”.
He is member of the Board of the Doctorate in Public Law (Università di Perugia) and professor of Italian and comparative constitutional law in the Master Program of the Institute for Defense Studies (I.A.S.D). He is component of the Working Group “Section Constitutional Law”, chaired by Prof. Jean Massot and Prof. Philippe Lauvaux, the “Societe’ de Legislation Comparee”.
Since 2011 he is lecturer at the School of Government of LUISS
 
    
No comments:
Post a Comment