Thursday, November 10, 2011

Dear Philip Howard Esq. phoward@cov.com

  • NY PML Sec 105 does not apply to the OTBs, public benefit corporations in New York.

    NY PML Sec 105 violates the rights of New York State Bettors secured by NY Const. Art. 1, Sec. 3.

    NY PML Sec 105 is not constitutionally defensible.

    No appropriate public person has asked the New York State Attorney General for a Formal or Informal Opinion. If the Attorney General opines that the statute is not constitutionally defensible, he will not defend it and bettors will be able to bet  and OTB workers will be able to work when tracks are running all across the United States if the OTBs chose to OPEN. As you remember the workers of New York City OTB were paid double time for working on ANY SUNDAY. NYC OTB died in bankruptcy.


    Please help. I need an Attorney to challenge NY PML Sec 105 so that I might be able to work and bet while those who wish to do otherwise are free to do so.









    NY PML Sec 105 is vague, indefinite and/or overly broad. The Gregorian and Julian Calendars do not define the same Sunday to be Easter Sunday in all years.

    Open On 1st Palm Sunday, Otb Rakes In $2m - New York Daily News

    articles.nydailynews.com/.../18220335_1_racing-and-wagering-boar...Cached
    Open On 1st Palm Sunday, Otb Rakes In $2m. BY JERRY BOSSERT DAILY NEWS SPORTS WRITER. Monday, April 14, 2003. New York City Off-Track Betting ...
  •  
  • §  105. Supplementary regulatory powers of the board.  Notwithstanding
      any inconsistent provision of law,  the  board  through  its  rules  and
      regulations  or  in  allotting  dates  for  racing  or in licensing race
      meetings at which pari-mutuel betting is permitted  shall  be  empowered
      to:  (i)  permit racing at which pari-mutuel betting is conducted on any
      or all dates from the first day of January through the thirty-first  day
      of December, inclusive of Sundays but exclusive of December twenty-fifth
      and  Palm  Sunday  and  Easter  Sunday; and (ii) fix minimum and maximum
      charges for admission at any race meeting.
     




    The Public-Union Albatross

    What it means when 90% of an agency's workers retire with disability benefits.


    The indictment of seven Long Island Rail Road workers for disability fraud last week cast a spotlight on a troubled government agency. Until recently, over 90% of LIRR workers retired with a disability—even those who worked desk jobs—adding about $36,000 to their annual pensions. The cost to New York taxpayers over the past decade was $300 million.
    As one investigator put it, fraud of this kind "became a culture of sorts among the LIRR workers, who took to gathering in doctor's waiting rooms bragging to each [other] about their disabilities while simultaneously talking about their golf game." How could almost every employee think fraud was the right thing to do?
    The LIRR disability epidemic is hardly unique—82% of senior California state troopers are "disabled" in their last year before retirement. Pension abuses are so common—for example, "spiking" pensions with excess overtime in the last year of employment—that they're taken for granted.
    Governors in Wisconsin and Ohio this year have led well-publicized showdowns with public unions. Union leaders argue they are "decimat[ing] the collective bargaining rights of public employees." What are these so-called "rights"? The dispute has focused on rich benefit packages that are drowning public budgets. Far more important is the lack of productivity.
    Images.com/Corbis
    "I've never seen anyone terminated for incompetence," observed a long-time human relations official in New York City. In Cincinnati, police personnel records must be expunged every few years—making periodic misconduct essentially unaccountable. Over the past decade, Los Angeles succeeded in firing five teachers (out of 33,000), at a cost of $3.5 million.
    Collective-bargaining rights have made government virtually unmanageable. Promotions, reassignments and layoffs are dictated by rigid rules, without any opportunity for managerial judgment. In 2010, shortly after receiving an award as best first-year teacher in Wisconsin, Megan Sampson had to be let go under "last in, first out" provisions of the union contract.
    Even what task someone should do on a given day is subject to detailed rules. Last year, when a virus disabled two computers in a shared federal office in Washington, D.C., the IT technician fixed one but said he was unable to fix the other because it wasn't listed on his form.
    Making things work better is an affront to union prerogatives. The refuse-collection union in Toledo sued when the city proposed consolidating garbage collection with the surrounding county. (Toledo ended up making a cash settlement.) In Wisconsin, when budget cuts eliminated funding to mow the grass along the roads, the union sued to stop the county executive from giving the job to inmates.
    No decision is too small for union micromanagement. Under the New York City union contract, when new equipment is installed the city must reopen collective bargaining "for the sole purpose of negotiating with the union on the practical impact, if any, such equipment has on the affected employees." Trying to get ideas from public employees can be illegal. A deputy mayor of New York City was "warned not to talk with employees in order to get suggestions" because it might violate the "direct dealing law."

    What's amazing is that anything gets done in government. This is a tribute to countless public employees who render public service, against all odds, by their personal pride and willpower, despite having to wrestle daily choices through a slimy bureaucracy.
    One huge hurdle stands in the way of making government manageable: public unions. The head of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees recently bragged that the union had contributed $90 million in the 2010 off-year election alone. Where did the unions get all that money? The power is imbedded in an artificial legal construct—a "collective-bargaining right" that deducts union dues from all public employees, whether or not they want to belong to the union.
    Some states, such as Indiana, have succeeded in eliminating this requirement. I would go further: America should ban political contributions by public unions, by constitutional amendment if necessary. Government is supposed to serve the public, not public employees.
    America must bulldoze the current system and start over. Only then can we balance budgets and restore competence, dignity and purpose to public service.
    Mr. Howard, a lawyer and author, is chair of Common Good (www.commongood.org).

     

    Philip K. Howard

    Partner

    phoward@cov.com
    Download V-card
    Covington & Burling LLP
    The New York Times Building
    620 Eighth Avenue
    New York, NY 10018-1405
    Tel: 212.841.1068


     

    Practices

    Education

    • University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1974
      • Order of the Coif
      • Law Review
    • Yale University, B.A., 1970

    Bar Admissions

    • New York

    Philip Howard is a senior corporate adviser, representing corporations and executives in a wide range of issues, including governance, regulatory disputes, securities litigation, and business transactions.  For many clients, Mr. Howard acts as coordinator of lawyers in different practice areas, particularly in corporate and litigation matters that have a significant regulatory or public relations component.  Mr. Howard is also one of America’s leading proponents of legal reform, and works closely with public officials, corporate executives, academics, and judges across the country.

    Representative Matters

    • KKR in a wide range of issues and disputes.
    • UBS’s merger and acquisition department.
    • Representing ex-Salomon CEO John Gutfreund in SEC investigation.
    • Hostile takeover battles, including The Bank of New York takeover of Irving Trust.

    Honors and Rankings

    • The Best Lawyers in America (2009)
    • Presidential Citation from American Medical Association (2005)

    Memberships and Affiliations

    •  Common Good, Chair
    •  Adviser to the SEC Chairman on Regulatory Simplification (1996-1997)
    •  Adviser to Al Gore’s Reinventing Government Initiative (1995-97)

    Publications and Speeches

    • Numerous essays in legal and trade journals
    • Periodic contributor to OpEd pages of The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal
    • "Life Without Lawyers: Liberating Americans from Too Much Law," W.W. Norton & Co. (2009), Author
    • "The Collapse of the Common Good," Ballantine (2002), Author
    • "The Death of Common Sense," Random House (1995), Author
    Print PDF Word Version Print this page



     
     
     








     Home New York State Unified Court System
     
     

     
     
     
     

    Attorney Detail
    as of 11/10/2011
     
    Registration Number: 1199736
       

    PHILIP KING HOWARD

    COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

    620 8TH AVE

    NEW YORK, NY 10018-1405

    United States

    (212) 841-1000


       
    Year Admitted in NY: 1975
    Appellate Division Department of Admission: 1
    Law School: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    Registration Status: Currently registered
    Next Registration: Oct 2012

    The Detail Report above contains information that has been provided by the attorney listed, with the exception of REGISTRATION STATUS, which is generated from the OCA database. Every effort is made to insure the information in the database is accurate and up-to-date.
    The good standing of an attorney and/or any information regarding disciplinary actions must be confirmed with the appropriate Appellate Division Department. Information on how to contact the Appellate Divisions of the Supreme Court in New York is available at www.nycourts.gov/courts.
    If the name of the attorney you are searching for does not appear, please try again with a different spelling. In addition, please be advised that attorneys listed in this database are listed by the name that corresponds to their name in the Appellate Division Admissions file. There are attorneys who currently use a name that differs from the name under which they were admitted. If you need additional information, please contact the NYS Office of Court Administration, Attorney Registration Unit at 212-428-2800.
    Courts
    Litigants
    Attorneys
    Jurors
    Judges
    Careers
    Search
     

    back to top
    www.NYCOURTS.gov

    No comments:

    Post a Comment