IT IS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY? nope?
Five-Star Nursing Homes
In 2011, Ken Chandler brought his elderly
mother to a nursing home that had Medicare’s seal of approval, a
five-star rating. After a series of troubling events there, Mr. Chandler
now feels misled.
Video Credit By Kassie Bracken and Taige Jensen on
Publish Date August 24, 2014.
Image CreditMax Whittaker for The New York Times
CARMICHAEL,
Calif. — The lobby of Rosewood Post-Acute Rehab, a nursing home in
this Sacramento suburb, bears all the touches of a luxury hotel,
including high ceilings, leather club chairs and paintings of bucolic
landscapes.
What really sets Rosewood apart, however, is its five-star rating from Medicare,
which has been assigning hotel-style ratings to nearly every nursing
home in the country for the last five years. Rosewood’s five-star status
— the best possible — places it in rarefied company: Only one-fifth of
more than 15,000 nursing homes nationwide hold such a distinction.
But an examination of the rating system
by The New York Times has found that Rosewood and many other top-ranked
nursing homes have been given a seal of approval that is based on
incomplete information and that can seriously mislead consumers,
investors and others about conditions at the homes.
The
Medicare ratings, which have become the gold standard across the
industry, are based in large part on self-reported data by the nursing
homes that the government does not verify. Only one of the three
criteria used to determine the star ratings — the results of annual
health inspections — relies on assessments from independent reviewers.
The other measures — staff levels and quality statistics — are reported
by the nursing homes and accepted by Medicare, with limited exceptions,
at face value.
The
ratings also do not take into account entire sets of potentially
negative information, including fines and other enforcement actions by
state, rather than federal, authorities, as well as complaints filed by
consumers with state agencies. Last year, the State of California, for
example, fined Rosewood $100,000 — the highest penalty possible — for
causing the 2006 death of a woman who was given an overdose of a
powerful blood thinner.
From 2009 to 2013, California fielded 102 consumer complaints and reports of problems at Rosewood, according to a state website. California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, which also tracks complaints, put the number even higher,
at 164, which it says is twice the state average. Nursing home
officials are appealing the state fine and point out that only a small
fraction of the complaints at Rosewood, which has about 110 beds, have
ever been substantiated. While that may be true, the sheer number could
be a sign of trouble, industry experts say.
In
interviews conducted during a recent visit, a half dozen current and
former residents, including some who had lived in other homes, said they
did not believe that the home merited a five-star rating. “If I fell
down, they’d pick me up, but that’s about it,” said Michael McFadden,
76, who has lived at Rosewood for several years.
John
L. Sorensen, the chief executive of North American Health Care, the
chain that operates Rosewood, said the quality of the home was
excellent. “I would put my parent there,” he said.
Rosewood
struggles with many of the same challenges faced by other nursing homes
around the country, offering a window into the rating system’s flaws,
The Times found. Many residents live three to a room, and there is often
a scarcity of basic supplies like washcloths, as well as a shortage of
quality staff, according to interviews with current and former patients,
their families and statements from former employees.
Lawsuits From Families
Rosewood
has also been the subject of about a dozen lawsuits in recent years
from patients and their families claiming substandard care.
“It
looks nice when you walk in,” said Bonnie Nathan, who said she placed
her mother in Rosewood in 2010 mainly because of its five-star rating.
She is now suing the home because she claims that workers there failed
to treat her mother, Janet Zagon, for a respiratory condition that led
to her death. “But I really didn’t have a sense of where patients were
going to be cared for,” Ms. Nathan said.
Mr. Sorensen said that his nursing home was not at fault and that even excellent homes occasionally make mistakes.
“While
we have had a few problems, they’re pretty minor compared to the
overall accomplishments and tremendous customer satisfaction that’s
being provided,” he said. The many lawsuits against Rosewood could be
attributed to a “very litigious marketplace” in the Sacramento area, he
said, and not to poor quality at the nursing home.
Receiving
a high star rating has never been more important to nursing homes. When
nurses and doctors discharge patients from hospitals, they often use
the ratings in referral decisions, and insurers consider them when
setting up preferred networks. The ratings are also often a first stop
for investors and lenders, who consult them to decide whether a nursing
home company is a safe bet.
“This
whole program has walked into parts of our industry that we never
expected,” said Steven Littlehale, executive vice president and chief
clinical officer at PointRight, one of a handful of consulting firms that advise nursing homes on how to improve their ratings.
Widespread acceptance of the ratings is leading to their use beyond the elder-care
industry. Beginning this year, Medicare plans to introduce similar
five-star ratings for hospitals, dialysis centers and home-health-care
agencies.
Federal
officials say that while the rating system can be improved — and that
they are working to make it better — it gives nursing homes incentives
to get better.
“We
have seen improvements,” said Dr. Patrick Conway, the chief medical
officer at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. As evidence,
he pointed to a decrease in the use of physical restraints by nursing
homes and in the number of homes reporting bedsores among patients at a
high risk of developing them.
But
some nursing homes are not truly improving. Instead, they have learned
how to game the rating system, according to interviews with current and
former nursing home employees, lawyers and patient advocacy groups.
Nationally,
the proportion of homes with above-average ratings has risen steadily.
In 2009, when the program began, 37 percent of them received four- or
five-star ratings. By 2013, nearly half did.
The
Times analysis shows that even nursing homes with a history of poor
care rate highly in the areas that rely on self-reported data. Of more
than 50 nursing homes on a federal watch list for quality, nearly
two-thirds hold four- or five-star ratings for their staff levels and
quality statistics. The same homes do not fare as well on the sole
criterion that is based on an independent review. More than 95 percent
of the homes on the watch list received one or two stars for the health
inspection, which is conducted by state workers.
“These
are among the very worst facilities, and yet they are self-reporting
data that gives them very high staffing and very high quality measures,”
said Toby S. Edelman, a senior policy lawyer with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, a nonprofit organization that helps patients. “It seems implausible.”
Medicare’s Skewed Star System
A 5-star rating system of nursing homes begun in 2009 is
intended to provide consumers with a way to measure quality. A home’s
rating is based on three criteria: its performance on annual health
inspections, its staffing levels and its performance on quality
indicators that are collected for every patient. But only the health
inspections are performed by the government; the other two are reported
by the homes.
The percentage of nursing homes awarded 1 to 5 stars in each category*
The government conducts health inspections of
homes annually, awarding them 1 to 5 stars. It uses constant
proportions from year to year. This is the basis for the overall rating.
HEALTH INSPECTION
Government reported
43%
42%
WORSE
PERFORMANCE
AVERAGE
PERFORMANCE
BETTER
PERFORMANCE
34%
34%
’09
’13
+
Nursing homes self-report their staffing
level rating. If it has 4 or 5 stars, then they get an extra star added
to their overall rating. The share of homes with 4 and 5 stars has
increased to 52 percent from 39 percent.
STAFFING LEVELS
Self-reported
28%
41%
52%
39%
’09
’13
+
And they get another star if they earn a
5-star rating for quality. The share of homes with 4 or 5 stars has
increased the most, to 65 percent from 36 percent.
QUALITY INDICATORS
Self-reported
16%
40%
65%
36%
’09
’13
=
When the staffing and quality indicators are
factored in, the share of homes with the better ratings has increased to
nearly half.
OVERALL
32%
42%
49%
37%
’09
’13
‘False Sense of Security’
The seed of Medicare’s five-star rating system was planted in 2007, when during a congressional hearing,
Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, asked why it was easier to shop
for washing machines than it was to select a nursing home. Medicare
officials set up the rating system in 2009, a move that was applauded by
consumer groups, who hoped that more transparency would lead to greater
accountability.
The
nursing home industry, which lobbied against the ratings, later largely
embraced them. An industry trade group, the American Health Care
Association, offers members a free service that helps companies track their star rating; it says the rising scores are evidence that quality is improving.
Some
advocates say the rating system is the best resource available. “I
think it’s imperfect, but it’s by far the most valuable tool for
people,” said Richard J. Mollot, executive director of the Long Term Care Community Coalition.
Other
patients’ groups consider the ratings so inflated that they no longer
support their use and have found them helpful only in weeding out the
worst-performing homes.
“They’ve given a false sense of security to the public,” Carole Herman, president of the Foundation Aiding the Elderly, a Sacramento patients’ rights group, said.
One
of the simplest ways to inflate a score, according to interviews with
academics and groups that monitor the process, is through the staffing
measure. Nursing homes get an extra star on their overall rating if they
score a four- or five-star rating on staff levels.
In 2009, only 39 percent of nursing homes had a four- or five-star rating for staff levels. By 2013, 52 percent did.
The
staff rating is based on a form that a home completes once a year, at
the time of the annual inspection. Homes often know when an inspection
will occur, and many of them have learned to add workers in the period
leading up to it.
The
inspection period is so crucial that in 2010, an administrator at a
home on Long Island described it as “our Super Bowl” and explained that
staff levels would drop once the inspection was completed. “The staffing
hours will be a little high for this week but will drop the following
week,” David Fielding, the administrator of the home, the Medford
Multicare Center for Living, wrote in an email, which was excerpted in a
lawsuit filed this year against the home by the New York State attorney general.
Since 2008, more than a dozen employees at the Medford home have been convicted
on charges of patient neglect and falsification of records. In June,
nine more were indicted on a range of charges related to the death of a
72-year-old woman, Aurelia Rios. Medford nonetheless holds a three-star,
or average, rating from Medicare and a four-star rating for its health
inspection, and state health workers reported no deficiencies during the
home’s most recent health inspection last August.
A
provision of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 requires Medicare to use
payroll data to verify the accuracy of staff levels, but the agency has
not begun to follow the requirement. The agency said it was still
working on the verification system and hoped to have it running soon.
The
other major part of the ratings that is not checked by Medicare, the
so-called quality measures, is also susceptible to manipulation. The
score in this area is based on data collected by the home about every
patient, such as whether bedridden or wheelchair patients are developing
bedsores and how many residents experience serious falls.
Nursing
homes receive an extra star on their overall rating if they get five
stars in this area. The number of nursing homes with five stars in
quality measures has increased significantly since the beginning of the
program, to 29 percent in 2013 from 11 percent in 2009.
“They need to spot-audit those, but they haven’t done it,” said Charlene Harrington, a professor emeritus at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, who is an expert on nursing home staffing.
Federal
officials acknowledged that the quality measures rating needed
improvement and said they were testing an auditing program that they
hoped to expand nationally. The agency also plans to consider additional
metrics, such as the number of residents being given antipsychotic
drugs.
Dr. David Gifford,
senior vice president of quality and regulatory affairs at the American
Health Care Association, the nursing home trade group, says the ratings
have had a positive effect on the industry. “I think it’s helped move
us all along in the right direction,” he said, adding that any
suggestion that facilities were manipulating their ratings was
far-fetched. “I have not seen any evidence of that or heard any evidence
of it,” he said.
A Five-Star Pursuit
Few have pursued top ratings with more zeal than North American Health Care,
which operates Rosewood and 34 other nursing homes scattered across
California and three other Western states. Each of the chain’s nursing
homes has a five-star rating, and the company maintains a team of more
than 30 nurses who conduct mock inspections to ensure the homes perform
well. In recent years, the chain has awarded $50,000 bonuses to nursing
home administrators who achieve or maintain a five-star rating.
“It’s
everything to us,” Mr. Sorensen, the chief executive of North American,
said. “If you create a product that people can trust and admire, the
profits that you hope for — they follow as a result of excellence.”
Despite
the chain’s exemplary performance in the Medicare ratings, Rosewood is
not the only one of its homes to have had problems that are not
reflected in the score. State inspectors concluded that staff at another
home, Chatsworth Park Health Care Center in Los Angeles, neglected in
2010 and 2011 to properly care for a man with Parkinson’s disease who
developed malnutrition and extensive bedsores, which typically occur
because of substandard care, and later died.
At
another of the chain’s nursing homes, the Grand Terrace Care Center
near San Bernardino, Calif., the staff failed in 2010 to properly care
for a woman with diabetes and other conditions. The coroner ruled that
her death was due in part to a urinary tract infection and bedsores that
had become so bad, they had developed gangrene and were infested with
maggots, according to a state report about the case.
In
2010, when both episodes took place, Chatsworth carried an overall
rating of three stars, and Grand Terrace was rated four stars. Both now
hold five-star ratings.
Mr. Sorensen said his staff disputed the facts in these cases, and he maintained that the residents received good care.
Neither
case shows up on the Medicare website. Until recently, California often
refused to cite nursing homes for federal-level violations, the only
type that counts toward a star rating. State workers are responsible for
enforcing both state and federal laws governing nursing homes. A
spokesman for the California Department of Public Health said the state
was now doing so.
Dr.
Conway, of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said his
agency worked hard to make sure states were enforcing federal law but
acknowledged that there had been problems. “We are aware of some issues
with states,” he said, adding that the federal website warned consumers
that state actions were not listed there. Still, he said, “the goal
would be not to have that gap.”
North American is also under investigation by the office of the inspector general for the federal Health and Human Services Department.
Mr. Sorensen declined to say what the investigation entailed, and a
spokesman for the inspector general’s office would not comment. It is
not publicly known whether the investigation relates to care.
Ed
Dudensing, a Sacramento lawyer who has represented several clients
against the chain’s homes, including Rosewood, said he had deposed more
than 30 current and former employees of North American Health Care in
recent years. Based on those interviews, he said, “I strongly disagree
with the suggestion that its nursing homes are five-star quality.”
Mr.
Sorensen said the lawsuits against Rosewood were without merit. “We’re
in this business because we want to do the right thing for our
patients,” he said. “That is our agenda.”
In
2012, nearly all of North American Health Care’s nursing homes held
four- or five-star ratings for staff levels, an outcome that Mr.
Sorensen attributed to the company’s investment in quality workers.
Nevertheless,
an analysis by The Times of 2012 staffing data reported by North
American’s nursing homes in California shows that the company
consistently reported higher levels of staffing to Medicare than it
reported to Medi-Cal, California’s health care program for the poor,
which audits the data.
The
chain’s 29 homes in California reported staff levels to the federal
government that were on average 23 percent higher than what they
reported to the state in 2012, the most recent year for which state data
were available. Statewide, California nursing homes reported levels to
Medicare that were 15 percent higher than what they reported to
Medi-Cal.
Mr.
Sorensen said the state and federal staff data could not be compared
because some employees, like the director of nursing and other
supervisory positions, were not counted by the state but were counted at
the federal level. He said the disparity could also be a result of
different reporting periods and month-to-month variations in staff and
patient levels.
A
spokesman for the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and
Development said that supervisory positions like the director of nursing
were included in state staff data and that the main reason for the
disparity was probably that the federal data accounted only for the two
weeks preceding the annual survey, while the state data reflected the
whole year.
Ms.
Harrington, who sits on the technical advisory board for Medicare’s
rating system and has served as an expert witness on behalf of
plaintiffs suing nursing homes, said the disparity showed that the
chain’s homes were probably adding people before the annual inspection.
“They’re inflating their staffing,” she said.
Even
as North American’s nursing homes were reporting high levels of
staffing to Medicare, executives were focusing on keeping labor costs
low, according to interviews with former employees and records made
available in connection with lawsuits.
In
2011, for example, the nursing home administrator at Rosewood
eliminated six full-time jobs and cut back on staff hours just days
after the annual inspection was completed, according to emails the chain
provided to plaintiff lawyers in a pending lawsuit against Rosewood.
Ms. Harrington described such cuts as “substantial.” The home received a
four-star rating in staffing that year.
Kyle
Dahl, Rosewood’s administrator at the time, said in an interview that
the staff reductions had been made to prepare for expected cuts to
Medicare and Medi-Cal. But he acknowledged that consultant nurses were
often brought in before the annual inspection to prepare the home. Their
presence also had the effect of keeping staff levels higher than usual.
Mr. Dahl likened the annual inspection to a visit from one’s
mother-in-law. “You might throw an extra vacuum over the carpet to make
sure everything looks good,” he said. “People could potentially staff up
during that time period.”
For
some families, however, all that effort did not translate to
high-quality care, and they said they wished they had better options.
Elizabeth Chandler and her husband, Ken, placed his mother in Rosewood
in 2011 to recover from a broken femur. Ms. Chandler said she had been
impressed that Rosewood had a top rating, “like a hotel.”
Mr.
Chandler’s mother died after experiencing serious falls at the home,
and the family is suing Rosewood. Ms. Chandler said she felt misled by
the rating system.
“You
don’t know where to look to get accurate information,” she said. “I can
go and find a preschool for my child better than I can find a skilled
nursing facility for my loved one.”Merle Ratner and Susan Ratner 718-823-0620 proudly present an inaccurate listing of a case brought by their father Eugene J. Ranter in which his wife and their mother Cecelia B Ratner intervened. Also note that Wells Fargo Advisors is a party to this action. Just ask Sandra Grannum?
The NY Court System is highly rated? Go to The Bronx, review the file and watch cases and form your own opinion? Highly rated (perhaps for some purposes and not for others?)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment