Attorney General Eric Schneiderman will likely tell us that Attorney General Eric Schneiderman won't defend the constitutionality of NY PML Sec 105 and that it does not even apply to Nassau OTB. You are of course free to go to Church with Andrew Cuomo if you wish while others buy and cash lottery tickets, bet horses, or just plain old work while the employer is still in business. Remember NYC OTB? Its workers were paid double time for working on any Sunday that they chose to work. Former NYC OTB Manager Barry Yomtov kept a paying gig when NYC OTB died by arranging a merger without a vote by members of Teamsters Local 858 with Local 707 in return for Barry Yomtov become a Business Agent of Local 707.
Ruling by Justice Dept. Opens a Door on Online Gambling
By EDWARD WYATT
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has reversed its long-held opposition to many forms of Internet gambling, removing a big legal obstacle for states that want to sanction online gambling to help fix their budget deficits.
The legal opinion, issued by the department’s office of legal counsel in September but made public on Friday, came in response to requests by New York and Illinois to clarify whether the Wire Act of 1961, which prohibits wagering over telecommunications systems that cross state or national borders, prevented those states from using the Internet to sell lottery tickets to adults within their own borders.
Although the opinion dealt specifically with lottery tickets, it opened the door for states to allow Internet poker and other forms of online betting that do not involve sports. Many states are interested in online gambling as a way to raise tax revenue.
New York has offered an online subscription service since 2005 that allows state residents to enter a string of Lotto or Mega Millions drawings.
The director of the New York Lottery, Gordon Medenica, said Saturday that the lottery had built a broader online gaming system for New York, but that the contractor that put the system together was wary about moving forward because it feared it could get into legal trouble.
“We’ve been waiting for a couple years,” Mr. Medenica said in a telephone interview. “We’re thrilled that this ruling has now come down and confirmed that our legal analysis was correct all along.”
As a result of the new policy, New York Lottery officials said they planned to add two additional jackpot games, Powerball and Sweet Million, to its current online lottery subscription service, and would allow New York residents to buy single-draw tickets online for the first time.
Mr. Medenica said it would take several months for the lottery to finalize the new offerings, and he said officials would “take a very cautious initial approach” in rolling out additional online options.
Michael Jones, the superintendent of the Illinois Lottery, said the request for clarification was prompted by research the state commissioned several years ago that indicated online sales could drive up participation. “When you look at the Internet, which is what everybody uses these days to buy everything, it seemed like a very, very logical thing to use the Internet to increase the player base,” Mr. Jones said. “States were in dire financial problems — the ability to use the lottery to raise revenue in a nontax way was a significant thing for states to do.”
He also said that online sales would enable the lottery to regulate purchases. “Right now we can’t guard against someone walking into a lottery retailer and buying too many tickets and behaving excessively,” Mr. Jones said. “Now with credit card purchases, we can guard against excessive play.”
Illinois could begin selling lottery tickets online in as soon as three months, he said.
The District of Columbia and Nevada have both approved limited forms of Internet gambling, and New Jersey has been considering legislation allowing sports betting and other forms of Internet gambling.
Steven Grossman, the Massachusetts state treasurer and the chairman of the state’s Lottery Commission, called the opinion a “turbocharged opportunity to engage new markets.”
“This will put additional pressure on Congress and others to allow online poker and other Internet gambling,” Mr. Grossman said.
Estimates of the size of the online gambling industry vary widely, from as low as $6 billion to as high as $100 billion. But even at the lower end, Mr. Grossman said, “that’s tens of billions of dollars that goes offshore.”
In a separate request in July, Senators Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, and Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, asked the Justice Department to clarify its position on Internet gambling, seeking either to affirm that federal law prohibits gambling over the Internet or to make sure that Congress has a role in drafting any expansion of online betting.
In a reply letter that was also issued Friday, the Justice Department said that while the new policy “differs from the department’s previous interpretation of the Wire Act, it reflects the department’s position in Congressional testimony at the time the Wire Act was passed in 1961.”
The new policy merely reverses the Justice Department’s longstanding position that all forms of online gambling are illegal in the United States. It does not necessarily pave the way for national rules governing online gambling.
But experts in gambling law said Saturday that the new policy does imply that states can band together to allow gambling across state borders. The exception would be online sports betting, which is explicitly prohibited under federal law.
“The next step,” said Mark Hichar, a partner and head of the gaming law group at the law firm Edwards Wildman in Boston, “could be for states to enter into compacts with each other to have interstate Internet wagering,” as some do now for horse racing.
The decision was cheered by states that have been contemplating gambling for the first time. But some gambling interest groups, like the American Gaming Association, which represents casino operators and makers of gambling equipment, said the opinion makes clear the need for a federal law establishing consistent regulatory standards.
“This is quite a Christmas present,” said I. Nelson Rose, a distinguished senior professor at Whittier Law School and a consultant to gambling companies and governments. “It says, ‘Keep it in your state and it’s legal.’ Given the continuing budget crisis, and so many states looking for ways to raise money, it’s really a major decision.”
Virginia A. Seitz, an assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s office of legal counsel, wrote in the opinion that the prohibition in the Wire Act of using interstate communications for gambling applies only to betting on a “sporting event or contest.”
As long as the gambling operator and the customer are within the same state, the opinion says, and the betting activity does not include sporting events, a state’s own laws apply. Another federal law, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, made it illegal for financial institutions to process payments for online wagers.
Taken together, the two laws allowed the Justice Department to invoke its authority over interstate communications as a means of blocking all Internet gambling.
Online gambling has been a focus in the Justice Department for years, but it burst into public view in April, when federal prosecutors charged the operators of three of the most popular online poker sites with fraud and money laundering.
The three sites, Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars and Absolute Poker, are based in Antigua and the Isle of Man, where online gambling is legal. That had made it difficult for American authorities to crack down on the operations, which had millions of United States customers.
But the Justice Department charged that the companies had used United States banks to process their transactions, violating the 2006 law that governed payment processing.
Those payment restrictions do not apply to transactions within a single state, however. With the ruling that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting, the way is clear for in-state online poker and other games.
Some gambling experts believed that the Justice Department’s position that the Wire Act prevented any Internet gambling conflicted with a federal appeals court decision, and therefore the new opinion simply confirmed what was already law.
But states have been reluctant to rely on the appeals court decision, handed down in 2002 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, because, in addition to the Justice Department’s continued crackdown, other federal and state court opinions offered conflicting directions.
The Justice Department previously tried to crack down on Internet gambling by going after companies that facilitated advertising for the gambling sites. In December 2007, Microsoft, Google and Yahoo paid a combined $31.5 million to settle federal charges that they promoted illegal gambling by serving ads for the gambling operations to other Web sites.
The legal opinion, issued by the department’s office of legal counsel in September but made public on Friday, came in response to requests by New York and Illinois to clarify whether the Wire Act of 1961, which prohibits wagering over telecommunications systems that cross state or national borders, prevented those states from using the Internet to sell lottery tickets to adults within their own borders.
Although the opinion dealt specifically with lottery tickets, it opened the door for states to allow Internet poker and other forms of online betting that do not involve sports. Many states are interested in online gambling as a way to raise tax revenue.
New York has offered an online subscription service since 2005 that allows state residents to enter a string of Lotto or Mega Millions drawings.
The director of the New York Lottery, Gordon Medenica, said Saturday that the lottery had built a broader online gaming system for New York, but that the contractor that put the system together was wary about moving forward because it feared it could get into legal trouble.
“We’ve been waiting for a couple years,” Mr. Medenica said in a telephone interview. “We’re thrilled that this ruling has now come down and confirmed that our legal analysis was correct all along.”
As a result of the new policy, New York Lottery officials said they planned to add two additional jackpot games, Powerball and Sweet Million, to its current online lottery subscription service, and would allow New York residents to buy single-draw tickets online for the first time.
Mr. Medenica said it would take several months for the lottery to finalize the new offerings, and he said officials would “take a very cautious initial approach” in rolling out additional online options.
Michael Jones, the superintendent of the Illinois Lottery, said the request for clarification was prompted by research the state commissioned several years ago that indicated online sales could drive up participation. “When you look at the Internet, which is what everybody uses these days to buy everything, it seemed like a very, very logical thing to use the Internet to increase the player base,” Mr. Jones said. “States were in dire financial problems — the ability to use the lottery to raise revenue in a nontax way was a significant thing for states to do.”
He also said that online sales would enable the lottery to regulate purchases. “Right now we can’t guard against someone walking into a lottery retailer and buying too many tickets and behaving excessively,” Mr. Jones said. “Now with credit card purchases, we can guard against excessive play.”
Illinois could begin selling lottery tickets online in as soon as three months, he said.
The District of Columbia and Nevada have both approved limited forms of Internet gambling, and New Jersey has been considering legislation allowing sports betting and other forms of Internet gambling.
Steven Grossman, the Massachusetts state treasurer and the chairman of the state’s Lottery Commission, called the opinion a “turbocharged opportunity to engage new markets.”
“This will put additional pressure on Congress and others to allow online poker and other Internet gambling,” Mr. Grossman said.
Estimates of the size of the online gambling industry vary widely, from as low as $6 billion to as high as $100 billion. But even at the lower end, Mr. Grossman said, “that’s tens of billions of dollars that goes offshore.”
In a separate request in July, Senators Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, and Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, asked the Justice Department to clarify its position on Internet gambling, seeking either to affirm that federal law prohibits gambling over the Internet or to make sure that Congress has a role in drafting any expansion of online betting.
In a reply letter that was also issued Friday, the Justice Department said that while the new policy “differs from the department’s previous interpretation of the Wire Act, it reflects the department’s position in Congressional testimony at the time the Wire Act was passed in 1961.”
The new policy merely reverses the Justice Department’s longstanding position that all forms of online gambling are illegal in the United States. It does not necessarily pave the way for national rules governing online gambling.
But experts in gambling law said Saturday that the new policy does imply that states can band together to allow gambling across state borders. The exception would be online sports betting, which is explicitly prohibited under federal law.
“The next step,” said Mark Hichar, a partner and head of the gaming law group at the law firm Edwards Wildman in Boston, “could be for states to enter into compacts with each other to have interstate Internet wagering,” as some do now for horse racing.
The decision was cheered by states that have been contemplating gambling for the first time. But some gambling interest groups, like the American Gaming Association, which represents casino operators and makers of gambling equipment, said the opinion makes clear the need for a federal law establishing consistent regulatory standards.
“This is quite a Christmas present,” said I. Nelson Rose, a distinguished senior professor at Whittier Law School and a consultant to gambling companies and governments. “It says, ‘Keep it in your state and it’s legal.’ Given the continuing budget crisis, and so many states looking for ways to raise money, it’s really a major decision.”
Virginia A. Seitz, an assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s office of legal counsel, wrote in the opinion that the prohibition in the Wire Act of using interstate communications for gambling applies only to betting on a “sporting event or contest.”
As long as the gambling operator and the customer are within the same state, the opinion says, and the betting activity does not include sporting events, a state’s own laws apply. Another federal law, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, made it illegal for financial institutions to process payments for online wagers.
Taken together, the two laws allowed the Justice Department to invoke its authority over interstate communications as a means of blocking all Internet gambling.
Online gambling has been a focus in the Justice Department for years, but it burst into public view in April, when federal prosecutors charged the operators of three of the most popular online poker sites with fraud and money laundering.
The three sites, Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars and Absolute Poker, are based in Antigua and the Isle of Man, where online gambling is legal. That had made it difficult for American authorities to crack down on the operations, which had millions of United States customers.
But the Justice Department charged that the companies had used United States banks to process their transactions, violating the 2006 law that governed payment processing.
Those payment restrictions do not apply to transactions within a single state, however. With the ruling that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting, the way is clear for in-state online poker and other games.
Some gambling experts believed that the Justice Department’s position that the Wire Act prevented any Internet gambling conflicted with a federal appeals court decision, and therefore the new opinion simply confirmed what was already law.
But states have been reluctant to rely on the appeals court decision, handed down in 2002 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, because, in addition to the Justice Department’s continued crackdown, other federal and state court opinions offered conflicting directions.
The Justice Department previously tried to crack down on Internet gambling by going after companies that facilitated advertising for the gambling sites. In December 2007, Microsoft, Google and Yahoo paid a combined $31.5 million to settle federal charges that they promoted illegal gambling by serving ads for the gambling operations to other Web sites.
Subject: Public Comment/Petition December 21st Meeting of the New York Racing and Wagering Board
PUBLIC COMMENT/PETITION DECEMBER 21st MEETING OF THE NEW YORK RACING AND WAGERING BOARD
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. A premeditated, willful, vicious and/or malicious failure by Governor Andrew Cuomo, the New York Racing and Wagering Board, OTB Presidents and elected and appointed officials of the State of New York to ask the New York State Attorney General for a FREE FORMAL OR INFORMAL OPINION is worse than ignorance of the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. A premeditated, willful, vicious and/or malicious failure by Governor Andrew Cuomo, the New York Racing and Wagering Board, OTB Presidents and elected and appointed officials of the State of New York to ask the New York State Attorney General for a FREE FORMAL OR INFORMAL OPINION is worse than ignorance of the law.
Introduction to Opinions - The New York State Attorney General
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Introduction to Opinions. This Website contains the Opinions of the Attorney General issued since 1995. Opinions are issued in response to requests by state ...
"We ought to get rid of the old myth that you're presumed to know the law," said Rep. John Conyers (D., Mich.), a member of the subcommittee.
"We ought to get rid of the old myth that you're presumed to know the law," said Rep. John Conyers (D., Mich.), a member of the subcommittee.
Criminal Code Is Overgrown, Legal Experts Tell Panel - WSJ.com
online.wsj.com/.../SB1000142405297020433610457709685200460...Cached
Not helpful? You can block online.wsj.com results when you're signed in to search.online.wsj.com
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
The federal criminal code has grown so large it ensnares everyday citizens who have no idea they are violating the law, ... U.S. NEWS; DECEMBER 14, 2011 ...
I again ask the New York Racing and Wagering Board to ask the Attorney General for a FORMAL OPINION regarding NY PML Sec 105.
1. NY PML Sec 105 does not apply to the OTBs.
2. NY PML Sec 105 is not constitutionally defensible.
3. NY PML Sec 105 violates the rights of New York State Bettors secured by NYConst. Art. 1, Sec. 3.
4. NY PML Sec 105 is vague, indefinite and/or overly broad. The Gregorian and Julian Calendars define different Sundays to be "Easter Sunday" in 2012 and in other years.
I have asked Lindenhurst Deputy Mayor and Trustee Kevin McCaffrey via email villageboard@villageoflindenhurst.com to ask Attorney General Eric Schneiderman for an Opinion. Kevin McCaffrey is also President of Teamsters Local 707 which merged with Teamsters Local 858 without providing Local 858 Members with a a copy of the Merger Agreement and related documents. Teamsters Local 858 represented the Managers of New York City OTB and employees of Nassau OTB. Upon the merger of Local 858 and Local 707 former Local 858 President Barry Yomtov became a "Business Agent" for Teamsters Local 707. Unlike Kevin McCaffrey, Barry Yomtov has no standing to ask the Attorney General for an Opinion. Nassau OTB has considerable outstanding liabilities. See eg.
I again ask the New York Racing and Wagering Board to ask the Attorney General for a FORMAL OPINION regarding NY PML Sec 105.
1. NY PML Sec 105 does not apply to the OTBs.
2. NY PML Sec 105 is not constitutionally defensible.
3. NY PML Sec 105 violates the rights of New York State Bettors secured by NYConst. Art. 1, Sec. 3.
4. NY PML Sec 105 is vague, indefinite and/or overly broad. The Gregorian and Julian Calendars define different Sundays to be "Easter Sunday" in 2012 and in other years.
I have asked Lindenhurst Deputy Mayor and Trustee Kevin McCaffrey via email villageboard@villageoflindenhurst.com to ask Attorney General Eric Schneiderman for an Opinion. Kevin McCaffrey is also President of Teamsters Local 707 which merged with Teamsters Local 858 without providing Local 858 Members with a a copy of the Merger Agreement and related documents. Teamsters Local 858 represented the Managers of New York City OTB and employees of Nassau OTB. Upon the merger of Local 858 and Local 707 former Local 858 President Barry Yomtov became a "Business Agent" for Teamsters Local 707. Unlike Kevin McCaffrey, Barry Yomtov has no standing to ask the Attorney General for an Opinion. Nassau OTB has considerable outstanding liabilities. See eg.
Extension for Nassau in OTB suit
Not helpful? You can block www.newsday.com results when you're signed in to search.www.newsday.com
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Extension for Nassau in OTB suit. Originally published: November 29, 2011 2:58 PM Updated: November 29, 2011 3:39 PM By YANCEY ROY ...
Dear Deputy Mayor and Village Trustee Kevin McCaffrey:
Please immediately ask Attorney General for an OPINION to resolve the following questions first raised by the Counsel for New York City OTB:
1. NY PML Sec 105 does not apply to the OTBs.
2. NY PML Sec 105 is not constitutionally defensible.
3. NY PML Sec 105 violates the rights of the bettors of Lindenhurst and the State of New York secured by NYConst. Art. 1, Sec. 3.
4. NY PML Sec 105 is vague, indefinite and/or overly broad. The Gregorian and Julian Calendars define different Sundays to be "Easter Sunday" in 2012 and in other years.
As you know Barry Yomtov and New York City OTB employees were paid double time for working on any Sunday.
Nassau OTB employees are paid time and a half for working on any Sunday.
New York City OTb has died in bankruptcy and Suffolk OTB has filed for and been denied bankruptcy.
Barry Yomtov was unable to obtain an Attorney General Opinion when he was President of Teamsters Local 858 because he had no standing to ask for one.
People should be free to work or not as they wish while they still have jobs. The OTBs are public benefit corporations and the fiscal condition of the State and its subdivisions is apparently "functionally bankrupt."
Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
December 15, 2011
Please immediately ask Attorney General for an OPINION to resolve the following questions first raised by the Counsel for New York City OTB:
1. NY PML Sec 105 does not apply to the OTBs.
2. NY PML Sec 105 is not constitutionally defensible.
3. NY PML Sec 105 violates the rights of the bettors of Lindenhurst and the State of New York secured by NYConst. Art. 1, Sec. 3.
4. NY PML Sec 105 is vague, indefinite and/or overly broad. The Gregorian and Julian Calendars define different Sundays to be "Easter Sunday" in 2012 and in other years.
As you know Barry Yomtov and New York City OTB employees were paid double time for working on any Sunday.
Nassau OTB employees are paid time and a half for working on any Sunday.
New York City OTb has died in bankruptcy and Suffolk OTB has filed for and been denied bankruptcy.
Barry Yomtov was unable to obtain an Attorney General Opinion when he was President of Teamsters Local 858 because he had no standing to ask for one.
People should be free to work or not as they wish while they still have jobs. The OTBs are public benefit corporations and the fiscal condition of the State and its subdivisions is apparently "functionally bankrupt."
Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
December 15, 2011
Open On 1st Palm Sunday, Otb Rakes In $2m - New York Daily News
articles.nydailynews.com/.../18220335_1_racing-and-wagering-boar...Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Open On 1st Palm Sunday, Otb Rakes In $2m. BY JERRY BOSSERT DAILY NEWS SPORTS WRITER. Monday, April 14, 2003. New York City Off-Track Betting ...
NY PML
NY PML
§ 105. Supplementary regulatory powers of the board. Notwithstanding
any inconsistent provision of law, the board through its rules and
regulations or in allotting dates for racing or in licensing race
meetings at which pari-mutuel betting is permitted shall be empowered
to: (i) permit racing at which pari-mutuel betting is conducted on any
or all dates from the first day of January through the thirty-first day
of December, inclusive of Sundays but exclusive of December twenty-fifth
and Palm Sunday and Easter Sunday; and (ii) fix minimum and maximum
charges for admission at any race meeting.
NY Const. Art. 1,
§ 3. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and
worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed
in this state to all humankind; and no person shall be rendered
incompetent to be a witness on account of his or her opinions on matters
of religious belief; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall
not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify
practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of this state.
Introduction to Opinions - The New York State Attorney General
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Introduction to Opinions. This Website contains the Opinions of the Attorney General issued since 1995. Opinions are issued in response to requests by state ...
| Sunday, April 1, 2012 Live Racing |
| Track Code | Track Name | Entry | Scratch | 1st Post ET | 1st Post Local | Time Zone | Stakes Race(s) | Stakes Grade | T.V. Indicator |
| FG | 72 | 0 | 1:40 PM | 12:40 PM | CDT | Louisiana Derby | 2 | ||
| Costa Rising Stakes | |||||||||
| Crescent City Derby | |||||||||
| New Orleans Handicap | 2 | ||||||||
| Bayou St. John Stakes | |||||||||
| Duncan F. Kenner Stakes | |||||||||
| Mervin H. Muniz Jr. Memorial Handicap | 2 | ||||||||
| FON | 48 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | ||||
| GG | 48 | 24 | 3:45 PM | 12:45 PM | PDT | ||||
| GP | 72 | 0 | 12:35 PM | 12:35 PM | EDT | ||||
| HAW | 72 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | ||||
| LA | 72 | 48 | 8:00 PM | 5:00 PM | PDT | ||||
| MNR | 72 | 48 | 7:00 PM | 7:00 PM | EDT | ||||
| OP | 48 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | Arkansas Breeders' S. | |||
| PRX | 120 | 96 | 12:25 PM | 12:25 PM | EDT | ||||
| RP | 48 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | ||||
| SA | 72 | 24 | 3:30 PM | 12:30 PM | PDT | ||||
| SUN | 120 | 24 | 2:45 PM | 12:45 PM | MDT | SPRC Claiming S. | |||
| TAM | 48 | 0 | 12:25 PM | 12:25 PM | EDT | ||||
| TP | 72 | 24 | 1:10 PM | 1:10 PM | EDT | ||||
| TUP | 120 | 0 | 4:00 PM | 1:00 PM | MST |
| Sunday, April 8, 2012 Live Racing |
| Track Code | Track Name | Entry | Scratch | 1st Post ET | 1st Post Local | Time Zone | Stakes Race(s) | Stakes Grade | T.V. Indicator |
| GG | 48 | 24 | 3:45 PM | 12:45 PM | PDT | ||||
| GP | 72 | 0 | 12:35 PM | 12:35 PM | EDT | Wait a While S. | |||
| RP | 48 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | ||||
| SA | 72 | 24 | 3:30 PM | 12:30 PM | PDT | Santa Lucia S. | |||
| SUN | 120 | 24 | 2:45 PM | 12:45 PM | MDT | ||||
| WO | 72 | 24 | 1:00 PM | 1:00 PM | EDT |
| Sunday, April 15, 2012 Live Racing |
| Track Code | Track Name | Entry | Scratch | 1st Post ET | 1st Post Local | Time Zone | Stakes Race(s) | Stakes Grade | T.V. Indicator |
| AQU | 72 | 0 | 1:00 PM | 1:00 PM | EDT | ||||
| FON | 48 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | ||||
| GG | 48 | 24 | 3:45 PM | 12:45 PM | PDT | ||||
| HAW | 72 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | ||||
| HST | 96 | 0 | 4:50 PM | 1:50 PM | PDT | ||||
| KEE | 48 | 0 | 1:15 PM | 1:15 PM | EDT | ||||
| LA | 72 | 48 | 8:00 PM | 5:00 PM | PDT | ||||
| LS | 72 | 0 | 2:35 PM | 1:35 PM | CDT | ||||
| MNR | 72 | 48 | 7:00 PM | 7:00 PM | EDT | ||||
| PRX | 120 | 96 | 12:25 PM | 12:25 PM | EDT | ||||
| RP | 48 | 0 | 2:30 PM | 1:30 PM | CDT | ||||
| SA | 72 | 24 | 3:30 PM | 12:30 PM | PDT | La Puente S. | |||
| SUN | 120 | 24 | 2:45 PM | 12:45 PM | MDT | Sunland Park H. | |||
| TAM | 48 | 0 | 12:25 PM | 12:25 PM | EDT | ||||
| TUP | 120 | 0 | 4:00 PM | 1:00 PM | MST | ||||
| WO | 72 | 24 | 1:00 PM | 1:00 PM | EDT |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment